Automakers and tech developers testing and deploying self-driving and advanced driver assistance features will no longer have to report as much detailed, public crash information to the federal government, according to a new framework released today by the US Department of Transportation.

https://archive.ph/wWwjG

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Serious question: If I get hit by one of these death machines, who can I (or my next-of-kin) sue? Has that been established in court?

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Serious answer: the owner of the vehicle is responsible for it. You sue the owner, their insurance, possibly your insurance, possibly tesla, possibly nobody. The best result is to walk away avoiding court with more money.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      In a Musk-approved world:

      • You’re hit by a Tesla in FSD mode, the driver gets sued for not driving.
      • You’re hit by a fully autonomous Tesla taxi, you get sued for vandalism.
      • You’re the driver and FSD hit someone, you get sued.
      • You’re the owner and the car hits someone while you’re not in it, you get sued for owning it.
      • You’re the owner and it catches fire with you inside, you(r estate) gets sued for “not maintaining it”.
      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 minutes ago

        In all cases, the warranty on the Tesla in question is immediately voided. And the odometer starts running 15% faster with every major incident.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This would be REALLY Corrupt if Elon Musk had donated a QUARTER BILLION DOLLARS TO TRUMP and then was Given a Government Oversight Position! FORTUNATELY Fox News told me that DIDNT happen!

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    13 hours ago

    All I can say is invest in 4k vehicle cameras. Get one facing one and one facing the rear. CYA for when these self-driving Teslas start crashing into everything.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Well that’s convenient for the author maker / oligarch / unelected government squatter running the country. I guess every once in awhile things just turn up his way.

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The boon here isn’t that it’ll allow them to bring a shoddy product to market. The boon is they’ll be able to continue milking investors by hiding the fact that they have no marketable product in this space while they keep selling off their stock.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I wonder if the author realizes there are other companies making “self-driving” vehicles.

    • DrFistington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I’m sure that they’re just as shitty and more concerned with profits than safety, just like Tesla. When you don’t punish companies and ceo’s like you would a homeless person, or teacher, or doctor, or police officer, or fireman, then they have no incentive to do anything other than profit at the expense of society.