• Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 个月前

    I dont think it’s quite the same thing though. US contractors won’t be fighting, I think they’ll just be maintaining and repairing equipment.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 个月前

      Arguably, a much more critical job for a capital-intensive army.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        11 个月前

        Yes, it’s actually huge. Especially for maintaining a weapon as complicated as an Abrams tank. If it can be repaired close to the front lines then that has the potential to cut days off the turnaround time compared to towing it over to Poland.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 个月前

          I will never understand why the American military think it’s a good idea to send them tanks that are so complicated. Especially when they’re going up against cold war era relics.