• AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The US isn’t sending troops into Gaza. This story is about NK sending troops into Ukraine. It’s not hard to see the clear difference.

    • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      70
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Nice slippery slope…

      Edit: Israel didn’t even need soldiers, Palestinians didn’t even have weapons to defend themselves and are starving to death, so money and weapons will do the work to continue with the genocide.

      • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Huh? In what way was what I said a “slippery slope”? This article is literally talking about NK sending troops to Ukraine. I wasn’t even the one to bring up NATO or the US in the first place.

        I wholeheartedly believe Palestine should be freed and that we shouldn’t be supplying weapons at all. The genocide is disgusting. But at least the US isn’t using US troops, nor are they doing trade deals to send more poor people into Gaza (like NK and Russia are doing in this article, except in Ukraine instead of Gaza).