Iran re-closed the Strait of Hormuz Friday instead of heading to Switzerland for nuclear negotiations, citing Israel’s refusal to pull forces out of southern Lebanon and US forces’ ongoing presence in the region.

In a statement read over maritime radio channels, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said the US was in violation of the memorandum of understanding between Washington and Tehran, which President Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed Wednesday.

“Since Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon, the complete lifting of the naval blockade, and the withdrawal of American terrorist forces from the Persian Gulf and the region are among the main conditions of the agreement between Iran and the United States, the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed until these conditions are met,” it said. “All ships are requested, for the sake of their security and safety, not to approach the Strait of Hormuz. Any vessel that defies this directive will be targeted.”

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Israel is the Main Culprit keeping the ECONOMICALLY NECESSARY Straight of Hormuz closed? And because of that the US Economy is going to be DEVESTATED? Quick! We MUST give the Israelis MORE US Taxdollars and MORE US Military Intelligence!

    -The US Congress LITERALLY!

    • freedom@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Those days are over! Say no to Israeli funding and YES to merging the military industrial complexes together so that you’ll never know where the money goes, let alone stop it.

      AIPAC is also dead! Long live a thousand innocent sounding organizations with “fundraisers” instead. Nothing nefarious, all above board. The most moral people work in the darkness in case you didn’t know.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nukes are so 20th century. Who needs nukes when you can literally shut down the global economy with a phone call?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      A phone call, an armada of speed boats, thousands of sea mines, and a mosaic defense strategy that allows for the continuous firing of ballistic missiles after suffering $1T in infrastructure damage.

  • Smaile@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    those local commanders are likely going to find themselves falling a sudden stop if they fuck up the central gov of iran’s 300 bill deal i suspect

      • ddplf@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t think you realize the scope of these sums. $300 billion is already a mindblowing amount of money, even for an entire country.

        That’s nearly 4x Iran’s entire annual budget revenue.

        • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah you right only 4 year of annual budget revenu for this kind of agression is not close to enough. How long will it take to rebuild, I wonder. Without saying they have to restock their ammunitions for the future

          • ddplf@szmer.info
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            I’m not saying it’s too much or that it’s uncalled for, I’m saying $300 billions is already an unsourmantably good deal and a sign of great victory, it’s just unrealistic to expect even more.

            • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Lol, why ? Elon have 2 trillions now, explain me why a country attacked a another, destroying infrastructur, killing families ruining countless lives, should be compensated less than one guy worth ? Dude just stop you are digging

              • ddplf@szmer.info
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                You’re literally comparing physical assets to some very serious robux money. And I’m the one delusional here? Plus - 2 trillions, give me a fucking break. Fuck off.

                • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Most people seem to think “So-and-so is worth X billion” means they have X billion in straight cash, they don’t know it includes any stocks or companies and properties they own or anything like that.

                  The rest of the people here that do understand that still don’t think anyone should own private property to be fair, but they’re not exactly thinking through how that works either. Basically (for example) instead of say Elon owning X and Tesla either he has to sell it to another rich guy for the trillions and then give that to Iran, or I guess transfer ownership of those assets directly to Iran so Iran just owns X and Tesla now, communism has nothing to do with it, no workers win, they just think “company bad” and all other thought goes out the window.

  • garbage_world@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Scummy from Iran. The US should immediately block the strait again and get back to bombarding Iran and killing their leaders

    • fisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      As much as I fear the consequences this will have for the economies of the world, especially poor countries who will get hit the hardest, I enjoy watching Trump and his friends get humiliated. They deserve it.

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Which won’t be long, hopefully.
      Come on, Death, do your fucking job!!

      (Though an excruciatingly painful and debilitating illness is much preferred. I’d wish a long life to the Donvict if that happens)

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    This whole thing is stupid as fuck.

    I’ve got no special love for Israel, but they are still an independent country that is not obligated to do as we ask.

    Trump made a deal that promises they’ll do something- a promise he had no standing to make. That’s like if I promised everyone reading this thread that if you upvote me, Elon Musk will give you a million dollars. I have no authority to make that promise because Elon never agreed to it, and he’s not bound by my statements.

    And since apparently Israel never agreed to this, and in fact said openly they don’t agree, this whole deal was bullshit from the start.

    Hope we didn’t send the money yet…

    • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      And the US - as an independent country - can also withhold military aid, intelligence, financial support, political cover at the UN, and overall Israeli dick sucking to get the ethno-fascist state to fall in line.

      You don’t provide any of that to Elon…though I can’t tell for certain about the dick sucking, but that’s totally your choice dude.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Lol

        Yeah we can absolutely do those things, and some of them we probably should just on general principle. I have always been of the belief that if you give a guy a gun and he shoots somebody, and you give him another gun and he shoots somebody else, you may not be responsible for the first shooting but you’re definitely responsible for the second. And all of the ones that come after that.

        So if you’re going to argue that we should take a harder stance with Israel, I’m definitely not going to disagree. Whether that will actually happen is a completely different story.

        However even if we weren’t going to strong-arm Israel, it’s basic dealmaking 101 that while bluffing is acceptable in some situations, when it comes time to put the cards on the table and play them, you can’t play a bluff.

        I could see this as a comedy skit

        Trump: if you reopen the Strait Israel will get out of Lebanon. Israel: no we won’t.
        Iran: okay we will open the strait and Israel will leave Lebanon. Israel: no we won’t leave Lebanon.
        Trump: okay we have a deal!
        Iran: Why isn’t Israel leaving Lebanon?
        Israel: is my phone on mute or something?

        • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Haha, I’d agree that it would be hilarious if so many people weren’t getting killed.

          Yes, Israel openly says that they won’t stop. But if those are the conditions that Iran puts to the deal and the US is agreeing to those conditions, then it’s really up to the US to pressure Israel to stop (via the multiple ways mentioned). Otherwise the conditions aren’t met.

  • usernametbd@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hopefully this helps drive a big wedge between Israel and the US. Lets stop giving them any weapons and aid. Tired of my tax dollars supporting a rich country dead set on genocide. Israel can handle their own affairs.