• Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not to defend Le Pen but barring opponents from elections is on page one of the fascist playbook.

    • Robbity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      French courts are independent. She will appeal, and another court will condemn her and her friends in appeal.

      The evidence is multitudinous and straightforward.

      Countries that have special rules for powerful people are the fascist ones.

    • Cliff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      She got convicted of embezzlement of public money. By a court. Not by another political party.

      • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yep but that’s what Putin also says before throwing people in jail.

        Courts can be corrupted and if that happens, an open election is the last chance before full dictatorship ensues.

        • troglodyte_mignon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Except in her case, it’s been proved that she’s been embezzling. Your argument makes no sense, you’re comparing two completely different situations.

        • Zentron@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Bro, are you fighting this with whataboutism and false equivalency ? Troll detected opinion rejected

          • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s not whataboutism if it’s on the same topic. I just raised a very real example where this is problematic.

            In the near future, I bet we will see the same in America.

            And what in this is false equivalency? We’re talking about banning criminals from elections, right?

        • seejur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 days ago

          What you are suggesting is even more dangerous though. Law immunity for politicians is even worse

          • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            No I’m saying she should definitely be in jail but rhat shouldn’t stop her from being in the election, if she wants.

        • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          And your evidence for the bold claim that the French justice system has been corrupted enough to fabricate and enter false evidence and land a conviction?

          What about evidence that french media freedoms have been suppressed so badly that every single news agency has been intimidated into not revealing leaked evidence of fabrication?

          • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I never said it was corrupted. I said in general, courts van be corrupted. See the supreme court of the USA for a recent example.

            • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ok, but in general so can any organisation/institution become corrupted. So can your local authority or the upper management of where you work or the local school board or the organisers of your favourite activity club.

              Your statement is tantamount to saying “corruption exists and is bad”. Well yeah, it has since people put a name to greed.

              Its good to keep an eye out for it, but unless there’s growing evidence for the case that French courts have been corrupted, like how there’s now a mountain’s worth for the US supreme court, then it’s not being skeptical it’s being very cynical.

              • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Finally someone who actually wants a debate.

                I agree that it’s not a problem until it is a problem. I think we differ in the way we are vigilant about defending the core of democracy.

                Open elections, free speech and free press are very important to defend, even if you happen to dislike the person in question. I’d rather defend free speech of a person I hate than slowly carving away at it, one “victory” at a time. If one person doesn’t have free speech, there is no free speech left.

                I see it the same with elections. If anyone can be barred from running in an election, the election isn’t open anymore.

                I don’t see it as skeptical versus cynical. Maybe in your eyes. What I’ve seen lately though is that democracy can be over very quickly, or in a way that no one can stop, even if you can see the signs. Look at USA right now, it’s been going down hill for a while now but most people are realizing too late to do anything.

                I’m not here to discuss France or their politics because I know nothing about it, nor about Le Pen. People seem to go very much into “it’s fine for now in France”.

                It’s fine until it isn’t.

        • quack@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Holy mother of false equivalence.

          So what’s the alternative then? Just let politicians get away with crimes and elect them anyway? Because that doesn’t seem to be going too well for the US.

          • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The alternative is to punish them like any other citizen: prison or fines. All I’m against is disallowing them to run in elections.

            If the people still vote for a convict, obviously the system is broken and needs to be fixed.

      • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, she’s a horrible person. I still think she should be in prison and be allowed to contest in elections. I would never bote for her but that’s a separate topic.

        Who the hell votes for a convicted felon?

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Nazi Bar Argument.

      If you just let a bunch of Mobsters and their blood money into the race, soon, the race will be taken over by them.

    • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Being really well dressed and using style to win people over is in the fascist playbook as well. Therefore drag queens are fascist.”
      That’s you. That’s you right now.