I dunno, it didn’t say. The implication is Newsom is a horrible human but it doesn’t give a reason for - well, or even an accounting of how - he ‘fought against this proposition’.
Okay, but since they have several hundred words here, they could probably put few towards specific remarks, written statements? Context, perhaps?
It reads like he stayed up all night calling state legislators (which doesn’t make sense if it’s a signature-driven proposition) or said something in an interview (also would be kinda weird, but you’d expect he’d give a reason at least), but it doesn’t say anything at all. Other than what you said.
Which was a lot more concise and to the point than what they had.
I dunno, it didn’t say. The implication is Newsom is a horrible human but it doesn’t give a reason for - well, or even an accounting of how - he ‘fought against this proposition’.
Just that he really, really did. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
He is just corporate scum. Nothing special milque-toast neo-lib trash.
Okay, but since they have several hundred words here, they could probably put few towards specific remarks, written statements? Context, perhaps?
It reads like he stayed up all night calling state legislators (which doesn’t make sense if it’s a signature-driven proposition) or said something in an interview (also would be kinda weird, but you’d expect he’d give a reason at least), but it doesn’t say anything at all. Other than what you said.
Which was a lot more concise and to the point than what they had.