• BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 minutes ago

    So we’re now at the point where change is proposed to be imposed on poorer groups to save money for rich institutions, and done under the guise of it being “for the environment”.

    For example, instead of slashing costs, this could have been sold as providing better quality, nutrition and value for the same cost. I.e. Spend the same but get better food for the money.

    But no, they had to target financial greed and shitting on the poor, in this case students.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Sounds like a win-win. Speaking as a non-vegan and non-vegetarian, meat should be less ubiquitous in our diets anyway.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Seems not bad, a lot of vegan and vegetarian food options with catering I’ve occasionaly sampled have gotten comparably tasty, too. I’m not a compulsive meat-eater but I’m not on any strictly plant based diets either. We’ve long known that water and energy inputs for plants are an order of magnitude less than meat for the same output.