NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg has reportedly floated a five-year, €100 billion package that allies are set to discuss in Brussels. Ahead of the meeting, he said Ukraine’s NATO membership was a question of “when, not if.”
NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg has reportedly floated a five-year, €100 billion package that allies are set to discuss in Brussels. Ahead of the meeting, he said Ukraine’s NATO membership was a question of “when, not if.”
When is a long time away. There’s conditions for joining and NATO can’t break its.owm charter on this, lest they’re not really NATO anymore.
While there are conditions, you seem to imply that not having a border dispute is one of them, but that’s actually not true, other countries with border disputes did join NATO in the past (see Greece and Turkey for example). It ultimately comes down to votes.
Greece and Turkey’s were primarily with each other though, and they were admitted together such that it became a dispute within NATO rather than between a NATO and non-NATO state
Which also has its own article in the charter. Basically NATO doesn’t involve itself if NATO nations are quarreling. Other nations of NATO can still involve themselves as much as they like, but under their own flags.
Canada and Denmark also had the most adorable and honestly, meaningless border dispute up until a couple years ago
I’m not implying.
Currently this is agreed by…
The principle conditions can change, go, etc. but Article 10 won’t see the votes happen if the current principle conditions listed above aren’t being or can be met upon joining. This is why it’s coincidence you bring up Turkey who had their membership under threat during the 2016 coup attempt as it conflicted with the first and third principles. However, they were met upon joining back in the '50s.
Since Russia obviously won’t be joining, Ukraine joining won’t suddenly have Russia agree with NATO that it’ll do it’s part too to ensure the conditions are met by Ukraine henceforth.
I can live with NATO2
NATWO