Tens of thousands of Israelis gathered outside the parliament building in Jerusalem on Sunday in the largest anti-government demonstration since the country went to war in October. They urged the government to reach a cease-fire deal to free dozens of hostages held by the Hamas militant group in Gaza and to hold early elections.

Israeli society was broadly united immediately after Oct. 7, when Hamas killed some 1,200 people during a cross-border attack and took 250 others hostage. Nearly six months of conflict have renewed divisions over the leadership of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, though the country remains largely in favor of the war.

Netanyahu has vowed to destroy Hamas and bring all the hostages home, yet those goals have been elusive. While Hamas has suffered heavy losses, it remains intact.

MBFC
Archive

  • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    Now imagine if they actually protested against the genocide they are committing.

    Makes you wonder how many of these protesters would be fine with it to continue if there was no hostages.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      The enemy of my enemy is my friend. At this point, pressure on the far right psychos in charge of Israel is a good thing, even if the protesters motives are less than ideal.

        • TheFriar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Stopping the ongoing genocide is fucking unquestionably necessary. If the far right psychos manage to put pressure on other far right psychos in order to do so, so be it. We’re not signing some pact with them. We’re trying to save lives.

            • TheFriar@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              No shit. But even a ceasefire will save some lives. This “all or nothing” attitude is so detrimental to progress.

              Yes, incrementalism is a disease, yes, signing treaties with far right genocidal maniacs is dicey at best, dropping aid as people continue to die isn’t enough. But cutting off any step in the right direction at the knees because “not good enough” is just so foolish.

              We. Need. To. Save. Lives.

              Do we also need to stop the genocide? Yes. Absolutely.

              We need to dismantle capitalism. But that doesn’t mean that passing strict regulations in the meantime is a waste of time. See what I’m saying?

              • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                7 months ago

                It’s not an all or nothing attitude, it’s a I’m not going to celebrate a slow genocide approach.

                Me dismissing of Israel’s genocide is not going to cause more people to die in the interim.

                Nor are these people protesting because they care what the international community thinks of them.

                They are protesting for selfish reasons. I have zero influence over this situation, so let me hate on genocide.

                • TheFriar@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Are you hating on genocide? It sounds like you’re trying to be the “no, I’M THE MORE RIGHTEOUS AMONG YOU!” person here. Because no one here is taking a pro-genocide stance. You’re drawing lines in the sand to say who can and can’t be helpful in saving lives because their motives aren’t pure.

                  That’s like a passerby rushing in to stop someone else from drowning a third person because they were worried they’d be charged too if they didn’t do anything. And you’re just standing on the beach shouting through cupped hands, “NO! DONT LISTEN TO THAT PERSON, THEIR MOTIVES ARENT PURE!”

                  So, in effect, you’re arguing for nothing to change if the people with some possible power to change it don’t agree with you. Sounds like a kinda pro genocide stance.

        • Orbituary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s unclear. What is clear is that they’re either unaware of the genocide on their doorstep, unwilling to stand up for that, or indoctrinated to ignore it.

    • Toldry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s pretty likely that at least some are still alive, since they were probably held in the Hamas tunnels under Gaza, safe from bombs.

      Hamas knows that living hostages are their strongest cards in negotitation, and they have historically gone to great lengths to secure this advantage.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Apparently Hamas transports them via ambulance, so depending on their exact reasons for doing that, the possibilities are all over the damn place

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Savvy way to make ambulances in Gaza less of a target for Isreal, which will hopefully keep some injured Palestinians alive as well.

        • TheFriar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Don’t be fooled, Israel has killed a few of their own hostages, and, as the article stated, the “brig the hostages home” line is more of a cover for the ongoing genocide than an actual worry of Israel. They’ve had multiple chances to save hostages, and have repeatedly bombed places intel told them hostages are being held. Israel does not give a shit about the hostages. It’s emotional leverage to continue eradicating Palestinian people, razing their land, settling there themselves, and punishing everyone in Gaza.

          The country that has repeatedly fired upon people receiving aid, shot their own hostages, slaughtered people waving white flags, carpet bombed “safe zones,” told civilians to leave an area only to shoot/bomb them as they ran, deliberately starved the people of Gaza, and shot in the foot multiple chances to get their own hostages back, believe it or not, does not give a shit about saving people. It’s all for corrupt ends.

          This channel did a great video on the subject

          • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah Bibi’s basically all but come right out and said that the Israeli military is now killing the hostages themselves to prevent them continuing to be used as negotiation chips.

            They’re to be executed for the crime of the Israeli public seeing them as a reason to negotiate with Hamas instead of exterminate them without prejudice.

  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Wow, I can’t believe all these Hamas agents got so embedded into Israel that their own family members were amongst the hostages. They’re playing the long game. I guess the IDF needs to start bombing Israeli cities, Hamas could be hiding anywhere at this point!

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    They urged the government to reach a cease-fire deal to free dozens of hostages held by the Hamas militant group in Gaza and to hold early elections.

    Netanyahu is also facing a litany of corruption charges which are slowly making their way through the courts, and critics say his decisions appear to be focused on political survival over the national interest.

    Netanyahu’s governing coalition appears to remain firmly intact, and even if he were ousted, top rival Benny Gantz is a war cabinet member and likely would continue many of his policies.

    In his Sunday address, Netanyahu also repeated his vow for a military ground offensive in Rafah, the southern Gaza city where more than half of territory’s population of 2.3 million now shelters after fleeing fighting elsewhere.

    Also Sunday, an Israeli airstrike hit a tent camp in the courtyard of a crowded hospital in central Gaza, killing two Palestinians and wounding another 15, including journalists working nearby.

    Not far from Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, dozens of Palestinian Christians gathered at the Holy Family Church to celebrate Easter, with incense wafting through the rare building that appeared untouched by war.


    The original article contains 1,119 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 83%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!