• nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      the problem is that American evangelicalism has tied money and goodness together with the prosperity gospel.

      The more money you have, the more gooderer you are, and all you have to do is give all your money to (church/fund/whatever target) and god will give it back to you three-fold!

      and there for, being against money by wanting to tax people means you are big evilsatanbad.

  • whereitsat@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    a guy who looks like a sleazy wall street exec, car salesman or television producer doesn’t want to tax rich people???

    i never would have guessed!!!

    at his best he still looks like an aging patrick bateman.

    a big difference between 30+ years ago and now is that the lizards can’t hide their tails; clinton and bush looked like normal american men; this dude just walked out of the bourgeoisie salon and has likely memorized his stylist and publicists cell numbers but probably can’t remember the name of his sons/daughters.

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fuck newsom in general, but I could see a rational argument that the tax should be national to prevent billionaire Californias from moving to the Nevada side of Lake Tahoe.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      And if he’s president, he will say he can’t enact the tax because billionaires would flee the US.

      We’ve had the same arguments in France. The economist who proposed the tax actually used data from the US to show that few rich people actually leave the place they’re in, because that’s where they live, meet people for business or pleasure, etc.

      This could be evaluated for California too.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Mamdani proved unequivocally that they won’t actually move. Stop giving in to the bullshit billionaires are spouting to try to stop themselves being taxed.

      Also, who fucking cares if they leave? Billionaires are a burden to the society and economy of any city or state they live in.

      And yes, FUCK NEWSOM! Say it loud and say it proud. NO MORE CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRATS!!!

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      He’s not arguing for that. He wants a national tax that both isn’t on the ballot and wouldn’t tax billionaires on their wealth.

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    5% tax on about 200 Californian billionaires who hold $2.2 trillion in wealth

    5% of 2.2 trillion is $11 billion, right?

    Jesus that would end poverty.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    No way, really?

    The guy who changed laws for his rich friends is against his rich friends having to pay comparatively insignificant sum that wont hurt their dragon hordes or its infinite growth in any significant fashion?

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    You mean this rich well connected individual isn’t going to burn their friends. You don’t say!

  • TronBronson@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    That man is the definition of afflueza, which I hear is only cured by Luigi fever or something idk all the weird media labels confuse me

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    He had me at no a long time ago when he said he “reveres the state of Israel and is proud to support it”. The guy is corrupt trash and doesnt belong in the party at all. Kick his rightwing ass out.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s worse, this is Nixon and the EPA all over again.

      Or Obamacare even.

      They know it’s unavoidable, and if they don’t act something effective might finally happen.

      So the oligarchs will pass something that says “tax billionaires” but absolutely no one will fall under it. When a progressive runs on “tax billionaires” everyone will point to this do nothing bill and say it’s already done.

      Taking the wind out of the movements sails…

      I’d like to say this shit should be obvious, but it’s clearly not for most people.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’d like to say this shit should be obvious, but it’s clearly not for most people.

        Its almost as if decades of attacking education and critical thought was the first step in destroying our democracy or something.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            1969 people didnt have the total sum of human knowledge and infinite possibilities towards personal improvement and learning in their pocket.

            • kreskin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              yes, AI and the internet will save us all. Its the modern equivalent to DuPonts “better living through chemistry” slogan.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              Yeah, but they said 1909 people didn’t have national TV news…

              Not to mention the Internet only tells you someone noticed something, another way to look at that is they had more critical thinking than we do today, because they had to fill in the blanks themselves.

              It’s insane how many times I’ve out time into a comment pulling form multiple different areas, and someone’s just says “source” without any context. And a single link that looks like it backs one thing up, is taken as proof for everything.

              Just the concept that someone is putting things together is inconceivable to people, that expect one single article that “proves” everything.

              It’s really fucking dangerous when a society blindly accepts authority like that, even without a demented fascist running the show.

    • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 days ago

      He’s not even proposing a wealth tax, his suggestion is literally toothless because it focuses on taxing income of billionaires more, which we already know doesn’t work because they don’t make an income.