Reading about FOSS philosophy, degoogling, becoming against corporations, and now a full-blown woke communist (like Linus Torvalds)

      • UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please explain communism for those who don’t understand. I lived in a communist country so it’s not for my benefit, but others might be curious.

        • raubarno@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay, maybe Lithuanian will explain better to an Estonian:

          Once in the 19th century there was a rapid industrialization. Farmers and citizen guild-workers lost their economical value and had to turn into factory workers. At that time, there was massive unemployment, and factory owners were unregulated. Then a philosopher Karl Marx went in, and started to analyse. He concluded that, in history, it’s always ‘slaves vs landowners’, then ‘peasants vs seniors’, and ultimately ‘workers vs enterprise owners (bourgeoisie)’. He named this phenomenon ‘class struggle’, and hypothesised that, after workers will defeat bourgeoisie, then it would be possible to create a perfect egalitarian society with no exploitation, in which people have all the rights except the right to be rich. That was called ‘Communism’, a proposed ideal society.

          His ideas attracted many followers, which were split into several political campus, for instance, Socialist democracy (‘mild’ socialism, rich people pay more taxes, etc.), Anarcho-Communism (no state, no regulations, lived only for a short period of time in Ukraine), and many more.

          Then V. Lenin came in, and told there must be a ‘peasants’ revolution’ that abolishes the existing state(s), kill all the enemies of that revolution, become a Socialist country (ie. State controls all the economy) and then slowly progress into Communism. His practices were furthermore refined by Stalin and were called ‘Marxism-Leninism’. History of the USSR shows that the power of a Socialist state can be used to create a totalitarian prison.

          So ‘Communism’ can mean either an egalitarian society or heading towards that direction, basically.

          • UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I appreciate your write up, but I think you replied to a different comment from some person in Estonia who might or might not have lived under that regime. Either way, Marxism-Leninism had been drilled into me for decades.

        • victoitor@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are a variety of views from different authors and political experiences. But they’re mostly rooted on not having privately owned means of production (a consensus exists for big corporations at least). This would mean big corporations cannot be privately owned, it must belong to the workers themselves. This implies the destination of profits should be decided between its workers, and not its owners. This might even make many more people rich than just some random dude (like Musk) for owning the whole thing.

          In general, there is no contradiction between being rich and communism. In fact, the workers should get the profits for what they build.

          • UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Dude, you don’t know the first thing about communism. “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” It means you don’t take more than you need. “Rich communist” is an oxymoron.

            • victoitor@lemmy.eco.br
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.

              First of all, I will say I’m definitely no expert on communism, but it’s definitely not true that “I don’t know a thing about it”.

              As I mentioned, there are quite a few views on what communism is. Communism precedes Marx and Engels and there is even a small book from Engels which discusses previous views of communism (called utopian) to their view of communism (called scientific). The phrase you mentioned precedes Marx and Engels’s work and they study how that phrase could become true. In their work, Marx and Engels do mention scientific communism cannot be exclusively theoretical (which they call praxis), for the risk of being utopian. So according to past and current experiences (USSR, China, Laos, Vietnam, Cuba, North Corea), there are quite a few developments and different views on communism. They don’t all agree on everything, but they do agree on “not having privately owned means of production”. On the Stalin era of USSR, it was considered something similar to the phrase you mentioned, but it was somewhat inneficient. People need incentives for their work and discoveries and it was not based exclusively on needs, as that phrase implies. The reality was complex, btw. This is really a generalistic view and don’t expect it to be flawless.

        • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be fair communist rhetoric online is a huge mess.

          On one hand, you have the communists who are like, “human rights inclusive of all gender identity, basic needs met for all, no state and no class society!”, very nice and cool, yay!!

          On the other hand, there are communists who are like, “install a dictator who kills all political dissidence, support foreign invasions, let’s go Soviet ultra-nationalism!”, very gross and yuck.