A surprise amount of Brits say they would take anti-obesity drugs if they were given to them for free on the NHS.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist are a family of medications that help manage blood sugar in patients with type 2 diabetes, but have also been found to help obese people lose weight.

The drugs include Mounjaro, also known as tirzepatide, and semaglutide, which is sold under the brand names Wegovy, Ozempic and Rybelsus.

The survey of 1,078 adults, carried out by Ipsos, found 24% of people would use weight-loss jabs if they were provided for free by the health service.

When asked about their own body image, four in 10 told the survey they think they are overweight or obese.

  • dave@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Poll reveals surprising number of editors don’t know how to use the word ‘amount’.

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The sort of diet that makes you overweight or obese causes loads of other problems. This might keep people out of the doctors in the morning for weight problems but they’ll be there after lunch for heart disease or cancer.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t think it’s the same as weight loss pills in the '80s

      This seems to be you crave age rather than simply increasing the rate at which you burn fat.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Many users describe an end to cravings and a reduction of consumption too.

      Mind this only persists while using the drug, but it may actually keep you from eating the “sort of diet”

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    21 hours ago

    When asked about their own body image, four in 10 told the survey they think they are overweight or obese.

    Government stats from January 12th, 2023:

    26% of adults in England are obese and a further 38% are overweight. This briefing covers statistics on obesity among adults and children in the UK

    • Mex@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      So about the number of people who are overweight think they are?

    • tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      This is using BMI, which while the vast majority of these people are at the very least overweight it will be missing all the unhealthy skinny fat people.

      I wish they would switch to a system that takes account of waist/hip ratio as if you do not have a narrower waist than hips (with a bigger differential if you are a woman) you are carrying more fat than you should be and are also at a risk of a variety of “fat” people illnesses such as heart attacks, diabetes, etc. despite your weight being in a normal range as you lack the muscle mass and/or skeletal mass for your height

      The actual number of people who need to sort out their diet and exercise is just shocking.

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I wonder how much it would cost to fund a nation wide programme of heavily subsidised gym usage. Bring the price right down to say £20 a month per user. Provide an allocation of personal trainers and physiotherapists. Create a vocational qualification if they don’t exist. Expand the availability of gyms so that they are convenient.

    Surely the long term health benefits (in addition to the benefits for your mental health) are going to be cheaper than jabbing yourself with drugs?

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Gym doesn’t help the weight issue. You gain weight in the gym, you lose it in the kitchen.

    • Monzcarro@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      I’m just speaking for myself here, so not saying this is true for everyone or even many people, but the cost of the gym isn’t the biggest barrier for me.

      I like what you say about expanding availability - there isn’t a gym within (reasonable) walking distance of me. I think facilities being in communities makes a difference.

      However, one of the biggest barriers to me is childcare. Somewhere where I could take them to do their own activities while I worked out would make it far more likely that I use it, and I suspect this is the case for others. My partner works long, unpredictable hours, so I can’t sign up for the weekly classes (that I did before having children) as I don’t know that he’ll be around to look after them.

      I also have chronic health issues, which don’t prevent me exercising all the time, but there are days where I cannot leave my bed because of migraine, so again, committing to something regular is difficult. (Again, persoal to me, but I’m not alone in having a chronic condition.)

      I tend to walk everywhere I can as accessing formal exercise has too many barriers for me, so I do have an acceptable level of fitness, but I miss doing classes as I found these really motivating.

      Sorry for the long reply - I don’t disagree that price and access are issues, but there are more besides that I think need to be addressed. Stress and available time being factors in additional to the others I mentioned.

      I also think there are issues with the weight loss drugs besides cost, one of those being the need to stay on them longterm. That’s not even getting into using weight as the sole metric of health.

      • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Very good points. I walk to our gym and I suppose that is a luxury. Even better if everyone had a place they could easily walk to. And also +1 on the child care point.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Recently there’s a lot of research about weight lost, and some of them found exercising isn’t a great way to lose weight, because when you do it regularly your body learn to adapt to the energy required for that activity. They found controlling what you eat is the better way, but i do know some people can’t lose weight that way either, no matter how hard they try. So this solution could be specifically aimed for that. Still, exercise is good for health though, pretty sure these jab will not have the benefits from exercising, and someone could very well rebound if they eat the same way that make them gain weight.

      Also i don’t think the accessibility of gym is the key, exercise cost nothing if you go out and jog or ride a bike.

      • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The trick is to fit exercise into a routine. Work + sleep + family + study can add up to all of the available hours. Subsidised gym won’t help with that.

        Eating well: that also takes time. And planning. This is where we should be focusing our attention if we want to improve our country’s health. Not weight loss jabs and not subsidising gyms.

    • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      but the gobmint isnt allowed to compete with the free market!!! its not fair!!!

      or something