• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I won’t reveal who reports who, but I will say it was someone else.

      The civility rule is NOT ambiguous:

      “Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members.”

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          It literally doesn’t matter who reported it, you broke the civility rule. Had I come across the comment organically I still would have removed it.

          Don’t attack other users. Full stop.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.world
              shield
              M
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Now you’re arguing with a mod after a civility violation. Temp banned.

              On further review, this appears to be a ban evading account of sunzu. Perma banned.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      i was wondering what you said since i can only see that it was removed.

      i’ve used milderer sarcasm than you have and my own comments have likewise been removed; i suspect that the fraught relationship that lemmy.world has with the rest of the lemmyverse is fueling overzealous moderation.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah I figured you would have picked up on it based on your comments

        It was something along the lines: “but have you thought about the right of rich Americans to defend themselves, ****Lord”