• Amelia_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s their own fault if they didn’t take the reasonable precautions that anyone should be aware of when going in to business for profit.

    Yes I did.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      That’s cherry picking a single scenario which allows you to sort of maintain your position, but still doesn’t even answer the question in that particular case, and certainly does not answer the question as to whether that mom and pop shop can be a victim.

      • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        They replied elsewhere, that victim is a personifying trait and that applying it to inanimate objects makes no sense.

        While corporations can be the victim of an attack in the technical sense, we wouldnt feel bad for the corporation because a corporation has no feelings that could be hurt, or any hopes that could be dashed, or whatever other reason someone might feel bad for a victim of something.

        In the table example, the table is a victim of the spilled drink but that is a meaningless distinction because a table that is a victim is exactly the same as that same table when its not a victim.

        You could say that the owner(s) of the business are the victims however, as they do have hopes and dreams and ambitions that are affected by these things. While you might still conclude the owners aren’t owed any sympathy, its for different reasons than a table would receive no sympathy.