• scripthook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I dusted off my 14 year old gaming pc, wiped windows 10 off it and installed Linux .int and hadn’t looked back. Glad my PC wasn’t eligible for a windows 11 upgrade…

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    My work laptop has windows 11, and for some reason I keep losing my mouse pointer. I’ll boot it up and there will just be no cursor. I can reset my graphics driver (which is what googling suggests), enable and disable my mouse in the hardware manager, tweak all kinds of mouse settings - and nothing. Sometimes opening a pdf in the edge browser brings it back, but it can still disappear afterwords.

    Also, pulling up the menu to print something can take several minutes. If I need to change printers on that menu, another several minutes. Sometimes, it’ll just crash the entire program I am trying to print from. It’ll also just ignore some settings occasionally - things like landscape versus portrait.

    The search feature in explorer is also absolutely broken. You can type in the exact file name of something and it’ll find everything but that file. Even the “recent files” section is broken.

    I don’t understand how anyone at Microsoft thinks Windows 11 is an acceptable product. Do they not use it?

  • M137@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have to use cloud streaming for gaming, Shadow specifically (because it’s the only one that can do mods, emulation and (though not specifically allowed but you gotta be a real idiot to get caught) pirating). While you can run it on most things (Linux and Android for me) the cloud computer is only Windows, and while I absolutely do not want to give any props or positive anything to Microsoft, I’ve had none of the issues with Win11 that have been reported throughout the years. This means nothing, obviously, as it’s only a subjective experience and these things wouldn’t be reported if they weren’t real problems. I’ve just been surprised over and over that I’ve had absolutely no sign of anything I’ve seen so much about. No matter my experience though, fuck microslop.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not really windows related but my work wonders why as an IT guy I think it’s a bad idea to force updates the day they come out.

  • bryndos@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Breaking onedrive? I’m confused. It’s like that thing in Southpark “How do you kill that which has no life?”

  • teft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    So, microsoft, how’s that vibe coding coming along?

    Why do i ask? Oh, no reason.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Idk how to tell you, but it’s AI that found the vulnerabilities created by humans in the first place… Of course they didn’t have to use AI to fix the discovered vulnerabilities, but it would’ve taken a lot longer and more than like still be riddled with bugs

      • sompreno@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        well yeah, humans make mistakes that ai is capable of finding but so does ai which also makes mistakes frequently.

        companies that use ai for bug fixing are spending extra on ai only for the ai to create Spaghetti code and require humans to go back and fix it anyway.

        Ai is good for quick code generation but when it comes to larger scale projects like creating an operating system its much better used as a tool to support devs rather then the other way round.

        • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I know. I said as much. But they vibe coded patches to vulnerabilities found by AI. Vulnerabilities created by humans

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        How is falling to show the name of a file in the recycle bin fixing a vulnerability?

        • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          It isn’t. They patched a shit ton of vulnerabilities. In the process, the broke the recycle bin confirmation.

  • peetabix@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah. My work machine now regularly black screens for up to 30 seconds then comes back. The Adobe Acrobat reader we are forced to use is now so bloated that it freezes the whole machine for up to a minute. What an OS.

    • AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Lately whenever someone complains their C partition is full, it’s always unmistakably Adobe’s fault. Their shitty way of updating piles up crap in the Windows Installer folder. Uninstalling Adobe and cleaning up its garbage, no joke, frees up anywhere from 20 to 40 gigabytes of storage. Insane.

      • Pringles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        What software are we talking about here? There is no way Acrobat takes up that much space. Photoshop might though.

        • AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Whatever the reader is called now. It’s a known “feature”. They use Windows Installer patch system to update the application, but for some reason if it fails to update, it just re-downloads the patch without removing the failed ones. Or at least that’s my understanding. Allegedly (according to Adobe at least) it’s a rare bug, but I’ve had over a dozen machines from end users where this caused C partition to run full and slow down/freeze/crash the system. And I’m being serious when I say some machines regained over 30GB of space after uninstalling the reader.

    • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      My work machine now regularly black screens for up to 30 seconds then comes back.

      Almost certainly driver, sometimes a failing dock or cable though.

      The Adobe Acrobat reader we are forced to use is now so bloated that it freezes the whole machine for up to a minute.

      That’s just adobe products. They’re great for subscription revenue for adobe.

      I switched to fedora for work myself and onlyoffice is handling my current pdf needs, works great and FOSS. Can save to DOCX and everything… and the same program handles those too.

      • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        We have monitors where static shock anywhere on the desk will turn off the monitors for a few seconds and then come back on. It’s very annoying

    • Reygle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ironically people who “btw I use Arch” have been FREAKING OUT because their precious arch user repository got massively infected with infostealer malware, lol

      This was just this week

      • lastweakness@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I use Arch, btw. But no, I wouldn’t blame my incompetence on my distro even if I were infected, which I wasn’t.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Mostly because they were doing the linux equivalent to downloading .exe’s from limewire.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        precious arch user repository

        I think you vastly overestimate the importance of AUR. A lot of Arch users had to say something about the incident and many of them didn‘t even use it. It‘s definitely nothing essential.

        Also Arch users still don‘t give a fuck about Windows. This whole AUR debacle has little to do with what OP was actually getting at.

        • Reygle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Maybe so. I use cachy just for the record, so I’m not piling on with linux hate. I’m just enjoying the madness of it all. :)

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            FYI, CachyOS is Arch based. It has access to the AUR. If you weren’t effected, that proves the point.

            The AUR is a repository of last resort. It’s useful, but you should be careful. That’s true even before this even. It’s a repository made by users, and is not verified.

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nobody is freaking out who isn’t a moron.

        There are a handful of arch users who eat crayons… if the windows users in 2026 leave any I mean.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        The Windows equivalent of this would basically be the discovery that a bunch of apps on the Microsoft Store were infected with malware.

        This really sucks for people that migrated to Linux without becoming Linux experts, and chose a friendly distro based on Arch that came with the AUR, like the often-recommended CachyOS.

        • Attacker94@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          There is a reason why the arch community had such a bad reputation when it came to newcomers, they were gate keeping good technical knowledge of the system. It had the side effect that most people became royal dicks on the forums and stopped being helpful, but it did have what I would consider the intended effect of people being wary of everything they did on their system.

          I find the easy arch distros to be fairly interesting since my recommendation has always been that anyone who wants to daily drive an arch distro should install arch through command line at least once and read about the packages they use. I personally run endeavor os, but I started by doing the leg work, which led me to the conclusion that I prefer flatpaks over aur if it is available because they are far more easier to maintain good security practices on.

          • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I think that’s a silly thing to say given that the arch wiki is the most comprehensive source of up to date technical Linux knowledge available to everybody. If you mean support for people on the distro itself, it does explicitly market itself to people who are already knowledgeable and willing to be their own support, so idk what you’d expect

        • Reygle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          CachyOS is completely 100% unaffected UNLESS people chose to install applications from the AUR.

              • XLE@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                And the AUR is not currently accepting registrations, so some degree of vetting is clearly happening in both cases. I don’t know how stringent for either.

                This wasn’t supposed to be a perfect one to one comparison, just an interesting sidenote lol

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I think they’re currently taking extra precautions, because of this event. I don’t think they were vetting users before. Regardless, it’s significantly less controlled than the Microsoft store. The equivalent of that is the official repository, not the user repository.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Couldn’t happen to a nicer group of people.

          Seems pretty unhealthy to be so weirdly angry at people who simply use a different Linux distro than you.

        • KingKong33@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Doing something to spite strangers is the most pathetic thing you could possibly do.

        • Reygle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Lol, I’d rather have AUR malware than Snap packages. You do you, friend. All the arch based distros are fine, only the AUR is affected, so unless someone goes out of their way to use the AUR they’re golden.

          • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I partially chose Linux Mint to skip the whole snap nonsense. I seriously don’t get how it’s been so accepted in various distros.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The company I work for is currently in the process of switching from our own server and email client to Outlook and OneDrive. It’s gonna be a fucking nightmare when we switch.

  • roboaddy@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Love that my work laptop had a forced rollout to Win 11. Excuse to have a break when it breaks.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      There’s an argument to be made that it’s better than what was previously released, given there are over 200 vulnerabilities to begin with. Though, Microsoft was slop long before AI

  • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Clickbait and misleading. Nothing “broke”. The recycling bin works just fine, the name of the file in the confirm delete popup is just displayed wrong.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It isn’t the details or severity of the break that matters.

      It’s that the quality control process is SUPPOSED to catch that, and whatever sorry excuse for a process they’re using now ALLOWED a break that was obvious, visible, and repeatable, inside a critical, core function of the operating system, to make it to the end users, something that should trigger as an immediate, flashing warning light. That means the entire quality control process at the very least is SEVERELY compromised and unreliable, and there could very easily be MUCH more severe vulnerabilities and bugs hiding underneath that AREN’T immediately visible. To anyone who has done any professional development for non-disposable code bases, this isn’t a whisper of a problem - it’s an air horn.

      • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        What exactly is “broken” about the recycling bin because of this?

        Does the recycling bin still work?

        Does the right file get deleted?

        You’ve got a strange definition of broken.

        • tomalley8342@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          it defeats the purpose of a confirm dialogue if it doesn’t correctly tell you what you’re confirming…

          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            No it doesn’t. You still have to click delete on the file that you want to delete. Confirm boxes don’t even need to show the name of the file you’re deleting, just confirm if you want to delete it. When you empty the recycle bin it doesn’t ask you if you’re sure you’d like to delete x, y, and z file names, for example.