Meloni heads Italy’s most rightwing government since the second world war. Italy’s criminal code punishes with a fine ranging from €1,000 to €5,000 anyone who “publicly defames the republic”, which includes the government, parliament, the courts and the army.

  • cisco877@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the sign of a civilised state, where you can’t just randomly offend whoever you want a scale, you need to go to court and prove that you actually have proofs about what you’re saying. I applaud this move from the government, the left wings after years of cutting public services to bend to corporativism and ECB, leaving the country in the hands of all sort of migrants without doing anything for security, finally got what they deserve, and now everyone else is a fascist, but with no content

    • nadir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, Lemmy has fascists now.

      The left wing was cutting public services, right. Famous left wing policy. I think you’re thinking of liberals.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s astounding these people still don’t realize how obvious their tells are. Blaming migrants? Almost certainly an insensible right winger.

      • Sarla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        One of the main ‘issues’ with decentralised social media is that it allows the fringes of the political spectrum to have a platform. We’ll have to find a way to get along.

            • acargitz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s part of a process.

              • Step 1. Nazi says nazi things.
              • Step 2. Non nazi reports to instance admin.
              • Step 3. If the nazi is local, the instance admin can choose to ban. If not, the instance admin can choose to ban the user from their own instance and then escalate to the nazi’s instance admin.
              • Step 4. If the nazi’s instance admin takes action, the nazi needs to find a new home, end of story. If not, that means that the nazi’s instance admin is chill with nazi shit.
              • Step 5. The local instance admin can then chose to defederate from an instance that is chill with nazi shit.

              To me this looks like a pretty robust process. What other steps would you add?

              • Zapafaz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Main thing I can think of is an option for non-admin users to block an instance on the client side. Like blocking a community or user except it does both, for everybody from that instance.

                • acargitz@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s already possible in Mastodon, so if Lemmy doesn’t do it already, it should be easy to ask and get implemented.

      • cisco877@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        It can’t be that whoever has a different opinion is a fascist, also because I was just having a conversation, it doesn’t make sense, if everyone else is a fascist, the term loses any meaning and it’s hard to fight back the real fascists. Guess another issue with the boom of lemmy is that all the judge juries and executors from twitter are arriving.

        • TwoGems@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          No you’re just a fascist agreeing with a fascist government. Might as well call yourself what you are.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fascism has an actual definition. People pretending it’s just a vague insult are likely fascists themselves in my experience.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry but people who openly admire Mussolini (the original self-proclaimed fascist) are fascists pretty much by definition. Sounds like you may be one of them.

    • Robaque@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      If “civilised” means I have to tolerate fascists then I don’t wanna be civilised

      • cisco877@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a fair point, I would agree in general, but those who are often asked to prove what they say are usually people in positions of power or with a huge base, like in this case a singer, not some poor working class. I can’t understand how why you people think that going to court for asserting guilt is fascist…

          • cisco877@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am not sure I understand what you are saying, it seems a bunch of buzzwords put together in a random way, starting from a civil court trial for defamation up to mafia to supreme court and back, they’re not even the same courts. Sorry I am not interested in juggling, there is a guy who has to prove that what he said has basis and is not defamation, he has money to pay for a lawyer, if you think everyone should be able to offend anyone without effects, be it, i don’t agree

      • cisco877@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seems like a great community with intelligent people able to sustain a conversation in the making, I’m understanding where twitter folks are moving