Do you think sexual harassment perpetrated by high profile people is never covered up?
If it was one woman, sure it’s possible it’s a disgruntled employee. When it’s multiple?
And yeah the fact that they removed him speaks volumes. People a little closer to this guy than you and I are thinking “we gotta get rid of this guy.” Probably trying to salvage what’s left of the ICJ’s reputation.
If the facts of the evidence is strong, it doesn’t really matter if this guy is replaced. In fact this guy has ab appearance of bias, and in a legal system even that appearance is disqualifying.
Oh right, the ICJ is the UN court in the Hague where they make bullshit claims about countries that go nowhere while the ICC is the UN court in the Hague where they make bullshit claims about the leaders of countries that go nowhere. They’re totally different! LOL
Do you think sexual harassment perpetrated by high profile people is never covered up?
If it was one woman, sure it’s possible it’s a disgruntled employee. When it’s multiple?
And yeah the fact that they removed him speaks volumes. People a little closer to this guy than you and I are thinking “we gotta get rid of this guy.” Probably trying to salvage what’s left of the ICJ’s reputation.
If the facts of the evidence is strong, it doesn’t really matter if this guy is replaced. In fact this guy has ab appearance of bias, and in a legal system even that appearance is disqualifying.
It’s the “ICC”, bud. You’ve been wrong from the start. Shut up and sit down Zionist shill.
Oh right, the ICJ is the UN court in the Hague where they make bullshit claims about countries that go nowhere while the ICC is the UN court in the Hague where they make bullshit claims about the leaders of countries that go nowhere. They’re totally different! LOL