• HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I think the best way to explain it is take the example to the extreme end - would bin laden have been capable of planning the 9/11 attacks from a hospital bed while not able to walk?

    Law and precident are literally semantics - the difference between a war crime with the penalty of death and a frowny face is literally the details.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      So then literally no one is protected then. According to you anyone could be a terrorist committing thought crime.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Feel like I’m talking with people trying to find a reason to be offended. Take 5 seconds

        Is every protected person

        • a known member of a terrorist organization

        • been wounded conducting what are considered terrorist actions

        • in proximity to two other terrorists

        • before considering what other information may be held by IDF.