looks into the bill
Yet another “stop the kicking of puppies” bill that also included sacrificing all firstborns to the dark lord.
Where is the bill? I pasted the sentence into DuckDuckGo, picked “Last month” and no relevant results
https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?q=“Missouri”+House+passes+bill+banning+AI+deepfake+porn+of+children.&df=m&noai=1&ia=web
They’re not even trying to hide it anymore
One issue per bill. Those fuckers need to start working for their money again, not just continually posturing for sound bites they can use in their next election. But wait…that’s getting a bit too close to transparency.
Limiting bills to one issue requires anyone acting in good faith at all.
Someone…should…probably…maybe…do…a…investigation…into…there…internet…search…history…just saying.
Literally easiest fucking moral dillema out there in modern world.
The stupid part is it’s almost always shit like. Bill bans ai child porn on page one legalizes real child porn on page two. Head line POLITICIAN VOTES TO KEEP AI CHILD PORM LEGAL.
Wouldn’t be surprised if this bill has horrid knock on effects that make every thing worse.
or that the ones that vote no have phones/computers filled with child porn… real or generated.
Remember, this is the epstein party we’re talking about
If a bill headlines as “think of the children” it is always evil and full of unrelated shit. No exceptions.
Good on those 3 republicans for looking out for their constituents. Now if you’ll excuse me I need to go take a shower after writing that last sentence.
The scary part is, since social media age verification was hidden in it… that might not be satire for once.
Oooh, funny that wasn’t mentioned by either the tweet or OP. That’s a significant factor.
AI porn is creeping/infesting into the normal porn sites.
Didn’t this bill also contained a social media ban?
Social media platforms would be required to implement age verification measures to ensure youth under 16 can’t create social media accounts and allow parents to oversee social media use by 16- and 17-year-olds.
Yes.
It’s tiresome how lawmakers love to put a ton of shit into a single vote.
It may be that is the actual reason these republicans voted no. Not that I trust them with kids close by, but 1 vote for a bill that looks more like a Walmart on crack than, well, a proper bill, I can imagine you end up voting in interesting ways sometimes.
This is a strategy, and has been for years, ever since political advertising became a thing over the air. “Congressman X voted NO on a bill that would stop people from drinking raw sewage (because it also contained a section that would limit the ability of the federal government to regulate food)”, etc.
It really is a pervasive issue, similar to how Republicans keep ramming pet projects into budget reconciliation bills in the House. We really need legislation that bars bills from containing unrelated items in them.
So that sounds good in theory, but in practice it is used to prevent anything the judiciary dislikes from being done. Have a single issue bill that all it says is it moves cannabis from class 1 to class 3 controlled substance? Well that affects interstate commerce too so whoopsie can’t write that law.
I’m not from the states so please forgive me if this is incorrect, but I’ve read a “bill” can start out as one thing. Get a load of traction, then be changed last minute to something else entirely just before the vote. Is that true? Seems impossible track if it is
Yup. Check the title of this bill vs the amendment
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/119/s1318/text
“Fallen Servicemembers Religious Heritage Restoration Act”
Amendment: "… Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:
1.Short titles; table of contents (a)Short titles This Act may be cited as the Foreign Intelligence Accountability Act and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act."
I’m speechless. I mean it actually makes sense in the context of the archaic US democratic system, but still…
they do that alot , the REPUBLICANS did this with NN bills which was actually disguising the TAX CUT of 2017.
it will be hard to do that in missouri , the republicans have total control of the state.
They just want AI to “ThInk abOUt THe cHildREn!”
Only 3?
The rest of em voted yes b/c they prefer the real stuff
Where’s the rest of the pork here?
deleted by creator
Investigate those enablers and pedophiles. Hang them all.
Or actually look deeper as to why they would have voted no before coming to the worst possible conclusion.
Read it again. What do you think “investigate” means?
I read it correctly the first time. You said “investigate” but then you decided what the result of said investigation should be. You’ve already found them guilty because of a headline.
investigate is the verb, but “those enablers and pedophiles” immediately labels them
and then “Hang them all” it pretty unambiguous
