• frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    The only reason it could be him and not a progressive is if progressives split their votes while the corporate-backed party members defer their votes to him, which is pretty much what happened in 2020’s primary.

    If the Democratic primary happens with most states using a form a Ranked Choice Voting for their party’s primary, then progressives have a better chance since the progressive candidates aren’t knocking each other out of the running.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      2020 only had like a month or so when the progressives totaled more than 50% in polling.

      The good news is in 2028 is I can’t really think of many viable progressives in the first place, and there are a ton of mediocre moderates who all think this is their time.

      • frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think we’d better prepare a progressive front runner sooner rather than later. Otherwise we end up like California’s most recent governor primary where the most progressive candidates didn’t really step forward until the last minute, knocked each other out, and now California gets another Newsome-lite type candidate as the front runner against a Republican rather than up against a Progressive.

        What happened is largely the fault of the voting system being a jungle primary instead of a more favorable system like a Ranked Robin version of ranked choice voting.