• diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why wouldn’t they want to sell a secondary product without any government meddling (not that the government has that much power lol)

    • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Legalization would bring in more government meddling, not less. Exactly as you said, the government doesn’t have that much power. Cartels currently have full control of production, distribution and profits. They do not want regulations, taxes and dealing with competition in uhh… less confrontational ways. That’s even if they’d be allowed into the market, which is unlikely.

        • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No it doesn’t. Speaking from Canadian experience, legalization was a crackdown on the wild west of dispensaries we had here.

            • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you want to toss out that argument, fine. Cartels don’t want legitimate competition at all. Legalization would flood the market with startups that they couldn’t control or compete with.

              I don’t know why I’m debating you on this.