Israeli PM said to have turned down proposal in early talks and continues to take tough line

  • ???@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think this is dumb. The title didn’t say all hostages. The article didn’t say all hostages. You invented this in your own head then decided to build an argument around it.

    • mwguy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean future articles covering it have said things like “Ceasefire for $x hostages rejected” for exactly this reason.

      • ???@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure but your case is still weak and honestly not even there.

        • mwguy@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Ceasefire-for-hostages”

          Would you assume that they’re asking for a ceasefire in a percentage of the territory or the full territory?

            • mwguy@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s not the truth. When you hear the title: “Netanyahu rejected ceasefire-for-hostages deal in Gaza, sources say”

              Do you assume that it’s 40% of the hostages for a ceasefire im 40% of the territory?

              • ???@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think if you want the truth then stop being lazy and read the whole article instead of getting your information from misinterpreting headlines.

                • mwguy@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I did. That’s why I pointed out the misleading headline as a comment. Had I not read the article I would have assumed that it was a ceasefire in 100% of the territory for 100% of the Hostages that Israel turned down.

                  Just like you would have.

                  • ???@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Just like you would have

                    Nope. But whatever you need to say to make yourself feel better.