Geneva Convention guidelines

We’ve had weapons equipped drones for a long time. Predator drones!

The glaring difference is the effectiveness of these cheap dji and similar drones dropping grenades.

Were they trying to forfeit? I really don’t understand the logic of driving almost straight at an enemy tank and showing your broad side.

Shoulder? Have you seen the power of recoilless weapons?

If they weren’t recoilless, the person firing them wouldn’t have a torso hahahahaha

Not downplaying, but to help your spelling, it’s particle in this situation.

And a denser bullet

Have you ever used a grenade launcher or an antitank weapon like an AT-4?

Exactly.

What is your point?

RPG comes from Ручной Противотанковый Гранатомёт
Meaning handheld, antitank, grenade launcher.

An M203 or an mk19 is a grenade launcher. An AT-4 or RPG-7 is a rocket or missile launcher, firing a warhead.

Do you see what I mean?

A grenade is a fragmentation device. And yes these are technically grenade launchers, but they’re specifically anti-armor, rocket or missile launchers.

Are you referring to an RPG-7?

To be clear, I’m not saying it’s technically incorrect, but it’s an old description. We don’t call calculators adding machines anymore either.

Not a grenade. Why are these listed as such? It’s an anti-armor weapon.

That looks more like an AT4 or RPG style weapon than a grenade launcher to me.

Nitric acid!!

Let’s not waste time! Add salt.

Sounds like fun! Got to go get a still though.

Just FYI, it’s duly.

I expect manually installation to monitor flanks or perimeters.

Don’t get ahead of yourself.

They’re hitting apartment buildings. A warehouse is not a weird target. It’s disruption that they’re intending.