Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett triggered fierce backlash from MAGA loyalists after forcefully questioning the Trump administration’s top lawyer and voicing skepticism over ending birthright citizenship during a heated Supreme Court argument.

Since taking office, Donald Trump has pushed for an executive order to end birthright citizenship, a constitutional guarantee under the 14th Amendment that grants automatic U.S. citizenship to anyone born on American soil.

During oral arguments, Barrett confronted Solicitor General Dean John Sauer, who was representing the Trump administration, over his dismissive response to Justice Elena Kagan’s concerns. Barrett sharply asked whether Sauer truly believed there was “no way” for plaintiffs to quickly challenge the executive order, suggesting that class-action certification might expedite the process.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    10 hours ago

    More proof the right wing does not, nor have they ever, given one flying fuck about the Constitution that they go on so much about.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s like they’d already been conditioned to be outraged about some other selectively-ignored sacred text…

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They have only read one of the amendments all the way through and part of another one and the rest is too boring to read.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Curious which ones? I don’t think they read all of the Second. The ding-a-lings certainly never read the First and actually understand it, because they keep acting like this is a “Christian” country, when the First says I don’t have to give two shits about the chosen lifestyle of the xtian book club. Meaning I most definitely have freedom FROM religion.

        • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          One in full is the second amendment, one they read partially is the first because they know FREE SPEECH and nothing else.

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            They only read part of the 2A, as well, and none of the context in the rest of the document about it, either.

            The whole “well regulated militia”, and who and why the militia is.