youradhere@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 天前A VPN Company Canceled All Lifetime Subscriptions, Claiming It Didn’t Know About Themwww.wired.comexternal-linkmessage-square155fedilinkarrow-up1692arrow-down110
arrow-up1682arrow-down1external-linkA VPN Company Canceled All Lifetime Subscriptions, Claiming It Didn’t Know About Themwww.wired.comyouradhere@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 天前message-square155fedilink
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·18 天前So you’d rather they just close the company down, so then no one can use their VPN. Big brain move.
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·18 天前The people operating the company do not deserve to run it. Maybe they should declare bankruptcy and let somebody who will honor the contracts buy it. Allowing this kind of anti-consumer behaviour just allows them to juggle the company around to get out of contracts.
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 天前OK so you’re against the sale of the company in the first place? That’s a different story.
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 天前Yes I think they should just honor the contracts and make a tiny bit less profit. They could even just add some sane limits if those were not present yet.
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-218 天前You have no idea about why they sold or how the financials of the business were. Of the contracts stated that the offer could be changed at the company’s choosing, are you ok with it then?
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·18 天前Sorry bud but I’m not going to continue replying to you because of your condescending tone. Are you ok with that?
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-216 天前I don’t care if you reply or not, it just makes you look like you can’t defend/support your position to even the most basic of questioning.
So you’d rather they just close the company down, so then no one can use their VPN. Big brain move.
The people operating the company do not deserve to run it. Maybe they should declare bankruptcy and let somebody who will honor the contracts buy it.
Allowing this kind of anti-consumer behaviour just allows them to juggle the company around to get out of contracts.
OK so you’re against the sale of the company in the first place? That’s a different story.
Yes I think they should just honor the contracts and make a tiny bit less profit.
They could even just add some sane limits if those were not present yet.
You have no idea about why they sold or how the financials of the business were.
Of the contracts stated that the offer could be changed at the company’s choosing, are you ok with it then?
Sorry bud but I’m not going to continue replying to you because of your condescending tone. Are you ok with that?
I don’t care if you reply or not, it just makes you look like you can’t defend/support your position to even the most basic of questioning.