Can’t win 'em all.
Can’t win 'em all.
But his competition is pro Russia. And it seems like it’s second nature to him to hate on his government.
I wonder how happy Putin would be when they get this guy that is known for spreading misinformation against the government trough a whole country.
How could I have missed that, lol. Thanks.
Anyways, I don’t think it’s too weird. It might even be to simply have their name up there. We’ll have to see.
This Lemmy thread is not an appropriate arena to advertise your personal politics.
Do you have a source for that? I’m trying to look for donors but don’t really find anything.
We would like to do Windows eventually, but it’s not a priority at the moment.
intentionally ignoring
I think you just read what you wanted to read don’t you think?
Consider Edge you edgy man.
I am the admin of a website where we have a place where our users can post custom content and rate the content of others.
We have discussed how it works and should work many times and came to the conclusion that we’d never want it to be public. Any report of abuse will be checked by the website owner directly in the database and even admins don’t have full access. Everybody tries to stay as far away from the personal ratings as possible.
We also noticed that it would be a lot more fragile when there are not many voters. A whole group that is negative about something wouldn’t get as much harassment as a single person having a unique opinion.
On our website we have a comment section that isn’t anonymous, and we even noticed that people often don’t post something negative when it would be obvious that they are the only one who has voted/rated something. (“Negative” is almost always constructive in our case)
These are just a few things that I think add to this discussion.
Making a browser addon/extension wouldn’t be too hard if you can get the data somewhere. And then it’s just a click of a button to get the functionality.
Hence why I gave a solution. It would simply become spam that should be handled by the instance where it originates from.
What if an instance sends 1000 fake hashes as votes?
What’s the difference from users though?
You’d give each user an anonymous vote ID that only the instance can link back to their username.
It should actually be made more private.
I don’t think any of the soldiers on the frontline are even worth torturing to be honest. None of them know anything as they’re simply being told to do something.
Injecting performance enhancing substances like testosterone is not allowed. So the rule is already there. The reason for injecting them is irrelevant and not part of the rule. If we can simply use a counter argument to nullify a rule that doesn’t really make it a rule anymore. We should however add possible edge cases in the future, but that doesn’t mean that we should be using opinions in current rulings before finding something that suits everybody.
Keep in mind that I’m not claiming anything about Imane Khelif.
Injecting testosterone is considered doping. So whatever their gender is, it’s not allowed. This makes trans people by default not eligible, regardless of what gender they’re playing as.
Have a look at this list: https://www.antidopingdatabase.com/facts/prohibited-list
My personal opinion is that trans people should just get their own part of the Olympics. Otherwise there is absolutely no way to keep it fair.
I wonder why these 2 countries specifically.
Some time ago it was reported that Russian Wagner groups have been spotted in Venezuela.
Now these 2 countries have banned Signal.
I read that this attack isn’t meant to keep the territory occupied and is more of wake up call for the Russians.
You mean mDNS/Zeroconf are using a tld that was already being used.
It means the maintainers have frozen their thongs.