• entwine413@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    13 hours ago

    What do regular home owners have to do with it? Most regular home owners only own one home.

    • BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No one mentioned regular home owners. Why are you making devisive comments not related to any point that were made?

      • entwine413@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The billionaire fortunes pale in comparison to the trillions of dollars of unearned appreciation owned by regular home owners.

        Yes they did.

        • BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          You’ll notice it wasn’t me though, so why am I being asked what somebody I’m actively disagreeing with means by “regular homeowners”?

        • BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Bollocks, billionaire propaganda. Less that 3,000 people collectively control more than 90% of the World’s wealth. It doesn’t pale in comparison to anything. You’re just a bootlicker, or contrarian, makes no difference. You’re still wrong.

            • BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              51 minutes ago

              What am I wrong about? You think the equity held by private honeowners is worth more than an infinite line of credit from JP Morgan and Chase Bank? You’re a moron.

              • entwine413@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                31 minutes ago

                There’s that pesky reading comprehension again.

                No one but the TLC was supporting corporate ownership of residential property.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’ve made a million dollars in appreciation on my home in the last 15 years.

      Are you telling me just because I own one home, that I’m not part of the problem?

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        No, you’re not the problem there. The problem in your scenario is the landlords buying up all available real estate and leasing it back. Not you.

        That million dollar gain has no actual value to you. You can’t get that money out of the house, because you’ll need to spend it to acquire new housing.

        And in the meantime, your tax payments are going to increase: you’re a victim of corporate investment in the housing market, not a perpetrator.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          Why do people keep saying that I can’t get that money out of the house?

          • I can use the equity as an asset to borrow money at low interest rates compared to unsecured loans.
          • I can sell the property and move to a lower cost of living location, or even just a smaller home if I wanted.
          • I can rent part of the property out at a rate commensurate with it’s current value.

          And, to top off your stupid assumptions, you say my tax payments will increase. That’s not how property tax is calculated at all. People see “Taxes per 100k” and assume that if your house price goes up, so do the taxes. Instead, municipalities set a total budget, and just divide it by the total value of all the homes in the area to come up with something called the “Mill rate.” If the municipal budget doesn’t change year to year, and all the house prices go up evenly, the mill rate simply goes down.

      • entwine413@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Correct. I’m telling you that individuals owning a single home aren’t part of the problem.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 minutes ago

          Individuals voting to keep the value of their home from dropping down to reasonable levels ARE the problem. That’s almost all home owners.