Not long ago, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani was demonized by leaders of both political parties. On Thursday night, the 34-year-old democratic socialist was celebrated as a political force, the face of the region’s sports renaissance, even the leader of “Mamdanistan.”

In a rally with Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., that drew thousands to a Brooklyn theater, the emboldened mayor delivered a fiery message to Democratic leaders in Washington — and even those considering 2028 presidential bids — as he worked to elevate a slate of likeminded candidates in Tuesday’s New York primaries.

“People often ask me what I think of the state of the Democratic Party. This slate here today is our answer,” Mamdani declared. “The Democratic Party must change.”

“The party of the past will not be what leads us into the future. We need a Democratic Party with backbone.”

He shared the stage with three congressional candidates, including two running against Democratic incumbents. All three identify, or have identified, as democratic socialists. They promised to “abolish ICE,” condemned the “genocide” in Israel and vowed to “tax the rich” if elected.

Mamdani endorsed political organizer Darializa Avila Chevalier over Rep. Adriano Espaillat, the chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, in New York’s 13th District, which includes parts of upper Manhattan and the Bronx.

Mamdani is also backing former New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, who is running against incumbent Rep. Dan Goldman in New York’s 10th District. And in New York’s 7th, he’s supporting democratic socialist state Assembly Member Claire Valdez against outgoing Rep. Nydia Velazquez’s handpicked successor.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20260620173014/https://wtop.com/national/2026/06/mamdani-tests-his-political-clout-in-new-yorks-primary-as-he-looks-to-reshape-the-democratic-party/

  • panthera_@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Democrats should appeal to independents and some Republicans. If Democrats just win in deep blue areas, they’re not getting anywhere.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This thread literally started with demonstrating that “abolish ICE” is the preferred choice over “keep ICE the same”. And that includes among independents. It’s not an issue that turns off voters. The whole theory that triangulating centrism that says nothing so as to never turn off a voter had failed. Multiple times now. Your theory of politics is wrong.

      • panthera_@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        From https://www.npr.org/2026/02/04/nx-s1-5690180/will-calls-to-abolish-ice-sway-voters-in-2026-the-strategy-has-democrats-split

        He warns the “abolish ICE” slogan may not be universally embraced among voters across the country. Democrats hoping to flip districts or win over swing voters, Cowan said, should lean into different language, such as calling for a “reform” or “overhaul” of ICE.

        He likens the debate to when many Democrats coalesced around the “defund the police” movement in 2020, a decision that Cowan argues created an opening for Trump to paint Democrats as soft on crime.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          JFC, “Jonathan Cowan, president and co-founder of the centrist think tank Third Way”. Paid advocate for centrism argues for centrism, and lies in the process. Democrats didn’t coalesce around Defund, and Defund never had majority support. And you disingenuously quote him as expertise.

          Even in the face of conservatives forming the fucking gestapo, with polls backing it up, you mealy mouthed losers can’t scrounge up a principle.

          • panthera_@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            If Democrats embrace banning ICE, expect Republicans to post ads such as the murder of Laken Riley by an illegal migrant and accuse Democrats of wanting to unleash criminals into the US. How would you counter these ads? Harris couldn’t do it.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              ICE wasn’t laying siege to cities with the budget of a military and murdering Americans then. That’s why there’s majority approval for abolishing it.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Because that’s a fantasy. The people in ICE are in it because they want to be doing this shit and are overjoyed they can be doing it in this way. Neither of the murderers were new to the organization. All the training and imagined culture of professional government service didn’t stop them from walking American streets with faces covered and then shooting American citizens. No one that participated in that can ever be trusted with authority ever again. Many of them should be imprisoned. You can’t reform the gestapo.

                  Why are you so precious about an agency younger than most voters?

                  • panthera_@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    The Gestapo was the Nazi secret police whose purpose was evil. In contrast, the purpose of ICE is to enforce immigration laws. Some police officers are bad but not all. If you abolish ICE, who will enforce immigration laws?