The inclusion of The Atlantic editor isn’t the only failing here. Why are they using a third party encrypted app? Why not use secure government communications? Anyone remember the uproar about using a private email server?
It’s the hypocrisy of leading the charge of “lock her up” and then doing worse in both of your terms. For example, calls to Trump from his stooges in Kiev with unsecured mobile phones.
Besides that, there was an investigation and then a public announcement of a re-opening of the investigation which very likely cost HRC the election.
The inclusion of The Atlantic editor isn’t the only failing here. Why are they using a third party encrypted app? Why not use secure government communications? Anyone remember the uproar about using a private email server?
But her emails!
But his phone app!
Yes. There were zero repercussions for HRC. I imagine the same here.
It’s the hypocrisy of leading the charge of “lock her up” and then doing worse in both of your terms. For example, calls to Trump from his stooges in Kiev with unsecured mobile phones.
Besides that, there was an investigation and then a public announcement of a re-opening of the investigation which very likely cost HRC the election.
Lock. Them. Up…
Edit: adding this timely link. Remember how the administration is laying off Russian cyber threats? https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/russia-targeting-signal-messenger