• Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Yeah… Kinda miffs people blaming the balances and checks. Like, they are there. They’re just being ignored. Lmfao. Cause some dipshits gave the fascists all 3 branches

    • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      I feel like if controlling all three branches is enough to undo the whole constitution, it wasnt that good. If they wanted to prevent a tyrant, they shouldve thought to ask “what if that tyrant is popular”

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I mean… A popular tyrant will win no matter the political system, because who’s gonna do anything about them?

      • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        If they wanted to prevent a tyrant, they shouldve thought to ask “what if that tyrant is popular”

        They did dude. What do you think the 2nd amendment is for.

        Also, you say that like controlling all 3 branches is a small thing. It means you control the whole government…

        • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The weakness with the Second Amendment is that it effectively relies on a minority winning if it gets to that point. I hope I don’t have to point out that wars that come down to numbers rarely end well