• zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    meh, subjectively i find that creates a “worst of both worlds” situation. but this comment was more about the futility of the development time that went into this specific feature

    • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      this comment was more about the futility of the development time that went into this specific feature

      yeah sorry, I should have been more specific with my answer: features like this are supposed to help you in a touch screen situation or in general with smaller screens.
      When the window is resized under a certain size, the left panel becomes hidden and with it part of the top bar, to make it less cluttered and confusing.

      • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        but …surely you could just do the same thing with the old design? artist’s rendition:

        in fact, now i look at it, it makes them look even more similar once i collapse the sidebar

        • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The difference is minimal, in the newer version you have 1 less element when the sidebar is collapsed (the hamburger menu).
          Generally speaking Gnome 44 is already well optimized, 45 is going to be a more “tweaks and small improvements” kind of update rather than a big design changes