I figured this is the correct community to post to since UHC is a multi-national company but if this is more suited to US News I can move it.
I figured this is the correct community to post to since UHC is a multi-national company but if this is more suited to US News I can move it.
I would normally be upset about something like this happening, and would never advocate for it. But then I think about how many lives this person is indirectly responsible for ruining and I feel less bad lol
At what point does indirectly become directly? I think what’s most important here is intent - this man was clearly knowledgeable enough to know he was causing harm and still chose to do so in order to increase shareholder profit. There is malice here no matter how you slice it.
Indirectly or directly doing it, they still had the same intentions either way (like you mentioned). Neither is anymore excusable than the other. One is just more legal.
lol deaths