I figured this is the correct community to post to since UHC is a multi-national company but if this is more suited to US News I can move it.

  • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 days ago

    At what point does indirectly become directly? I think what’s most important here is intent - this man was clearly knowledgeable enough to know he was causing harm and still chose to do so in order to increase shareholder profit. There is malice here no matter how you slice it.

    • TehPers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Indirectly or directly doing it, they still had the same intentions either way (like you mentioned). Neither is anymore excusable than the other. One is just more legal.