British computer business Raspberry Pi is finalising plans to float on the stock market this month in a transaction that could value it at up to £500 million.

The Cambridge-based business is best known for selling low-cost, credit-card-sized computers to help children learn to code.

The float could take place within the next ten days, according to City sources, although they cautioned that it could be delayed if market conditions deteriorate.

Raspberry Pi’s figures for 2022, the latest accounts filed at Companies House, show it employed 94 staff and made $20 million of operating profit from $187 million of revenue.

If the flotation takes place, it would be the second attempt by Raspberry Pi to list on the market. Upton had aimed to float the company in London in 2021 but ditched the plan when stock markets were knocked by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Raspberry Pi was also hit by a worldwide shortage of semiconductor chips.

Upton, who works at the firm with his wife, Liz, revived talk of a listing last October when he said “when the markets are ready, we’ll be ready as well”. It is understood Raspberry Pi has been telling prospective investors that it can grow the company by selling more of its products to businesses and through international sales.

Archive

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Raspberry Bye

    This was a company with (amongst a couple of other things) a positive goal around education for anyone interested, for the lowest economically feasible price

    That’s incompatible with capitalist shareholders

  • the_weez@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Oh, so this is why they put the hobbyists last in line when the ‘shortage’ happened. They prioritize companies to look better to the stock market. For some reason I thought they were non-profit but I guess if that was ever true it’s not now. I have to imagine this won’t be good for the average pi enjoyer.

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      They are both. There is a non profit foundation which funds the educational side and the main company which operates for a profit. I suspect the bulk of their revenue comes from the industrial side of things where the Pi makes a much better base than a lot of the half assed hacked together SBC’s out in the market.

      There have certainly been mis-steps asking the way but all in all I consider the Pi to be a British success story. I guess it remains to be seen how much of the valuation goes to the founders and employees and how much is invested into their next phase of growth.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They were, yes. Their social media Watergate really upended them for me. The events since and now, this is all downhill. Barring a complete reversal of corporate attitude, I will probably not be back.

        • Alex@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          This isn’t still complaining about the fact they hired an ex-policeman?

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Sort of. The response to that was totally uncalled for. And they just kept digging when they had a chance to turn it around.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 months ago

    Shame the UK isn’t into nationalisation anymore could have had a real nice BBC micro 2.0 now it’s just amstrad

    • Sizzler@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I was interested in an Amstrad HiFi for retro reasons and tumbled down the rabbit hole. Alan Sugar conned an entire country.

  • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    At least there are plenty of alternatives on the market already. When the enshittification takes hold, we’ll still have options.

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There are lots of SBCs out there but the difference really comes down to documentation and how upstreamable everything is. The Pi might not be perfect but it’s a much more reliable design to build something with than many of the other options.

    • twinnie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      But what are the other options that aren’t from some random Chinese company? I tried a Beaglebone but it was so slow at a similar price point.

      • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve had good luck with a Rock64. Not sure about performance vs a pi, but it’s running great as a magic mirror.

        I’ve heard good things about Orange Pi too, though can’t say I have one.

    • ____@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      On one hand, I’m a fan of the ESP32 as a challenge.

      OTOH, sometimes you actually need a full fledged computer for your semi embedded task, and sometimes you just don’t want to (or can’t be seen to, from PR standpoint) support Beijing.

      While arguments can be made either way about the prior para, from a biz POV, it’s pretty binary.

      Would love to find similar platforms that don’t involve those concerns and might theoretically be commercializable by hackers, but I’m not aware of many.