☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agoChina's representative points out at the ICJ that armed resistance against occupation is enshrined in international law and is not terrorism.media.mas.tovideomessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1104arrow-down110file-text
arrow-up194arrow-down1videoChina's representative points out at the ICJ that armed resistance against occupation is enshrined in international law and is not terrorism.media.mas.to☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square19fedilinkfile-text
Your browser does not support playing HTML5 video. You can download a copy of the video file instead.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up24arrow-down6·6 months agoyou mean this Tibet? https://www.historicly.net/p/tibet-china-and-the-violent-reaction
minus-squareacargitz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down13·6 months agoIf being reactionary meant relinquishing the right to national self determination, the Israelis would be justified in opposing a free Palestine on the basis of Hamas being salafist shits. But they are not because it does not.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down2·6 months agoIf you can’t understand the sheer absurdity of your comment, there’s really no helping you.
minus-square小莱卡@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·6 months agoSurely upholding the slaver tibetan aristocratic class was the tibetan people wishes 😂
you mean this Tibet? https://www.historicly.net/p/tibet-china-and-the-violent-reaction
If being reactionary meant relinquishing the right to national self determination, the Israelis would be justified in opposing a free Palestine on the basis of Hamas being salafist shits. But they are not because it does not.
If you can’t understand the sheer absurdity of your comment, there’s really no helping you.
Surely upholding the slaver tibetan aristocratic class was the tibetan people wishes 😂