Kinda like now, only now there’s a lot more dead bodies

  • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yep, the reason I don’t want to mention Europe here is because Bush was and still is pretty widely despised in Europe as it is. I feel like the US still looks back at him with some nostalgia (remember how funny he was in that golf video?), but IMO it’s just because they didn’t really face any direct repercussions. Even if they paid trillions for his stupid wars, the effect was more indirect.

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      didn’t really face any direct repercussions.

      Other than, like, the PATRIOT act and the beginning of the end for privacy and civil rights in the name of national security. Or a ton of education programs gutted to support No Child Left Behind. The effects might not be obvious but they are directly caused by his administration.

      • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t disagree with you, but I feel like we’re talking about different things. My focus is on what the general population sees and feels, yours is in on the legislative impact of the administration. The effects of those laws are of course felt now, but not many can draw the line back to the Bush administration when making the next voting decision. Contrast this to the Iran war, where the gas prices rose within weeks or days.