• folaht@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Is there a source for the Epstein files outside the US that does not get its source from the US?

      • Darthcapi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        As England has made more arrests for Epstein related crimes than the US has I would go out on a limb and say yes, there are sources for the Epstein files outside of the US.

        • folaht@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Or maybe they just took the Epstein files seriously and didn’t react until those files were released instead of when Epstein was arrested.
          Have you thought of that?

          And why would you trust any news media that has either a network of pedophile rapists where not even a public protest happened against it demanding for their heads, or any source of a vassal nation that just repeats the source of the Epstein class?

          If you want to see multiple sources refuting “Russia’s state media claims”,
          here’s what “multiple sources” look like: https://youtu.be/ZggCipbiHwE

          And here are “multiple sources” saying what a great company Amazon is:
          https://youtu.be/S5-5IrTJk2w

          • Darthcapi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            What network of pedophiles are you referring to? Who said Amazon was a great company? And as I’ve mentioned previously, media consolidation and ownership is shit. This is all because I asked for an additional source? And local stations are an awful place to get news. What’s your main point?

            • folaht@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              What network of pedophiles are you referring to?

              The network of at least these people:

              Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Jean-Luc Brunel, Donald Trump,
              Leslie Wexner, Peter Attia, Elon Musk, Ehud Barak, Leon Black,
              Peter Mandelson, Ken Starr, Ahmed bin Sulayem, Larry Summers,
              Peter Thiel, Nathan Wolfe, Thorbjørn Jagland, Mona Juul, Terje Rød-Larsen,
              Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor

              What’s your main point?

              Making up arbitrary rules and then implementing them selectively
              just means that you’re spreading propaganda.

              You’re not going to get any other source.
              If there’s only one source, there’s only one source.

              • Darthcapi@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                When you said network I was thinking TV network, my mistake. No other source means you’re just pushing propaganda that fits your narrative. East or west doesn’t matter

                • folaht@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 hours ago

                  No other source means you’re just pushing propaganda that fits your narrative.

                  And do you have any other sources except for yourself or the western propaganda source you got it from, to back that up?

                  Also, the UK is a western source just like the US, so that’s the same source.
                  Thus you still haven’t provided a second source for the Epstein files.
                  Also, has the UK confirmed that Epstein killed himself and/or is dead?
                  Otherwise, how do we even know Epstein hasn’t simply been released from prison?

    • Smackyroon@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Article on a good outlet about how western media lies

      Asks for western media propaganda articles because RuSSiAn STaTe MedIA

      Libs never cease to amaze me

      • Darthcapi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        So…no? I’m asking genuinely but I suspect you’re just trolling. Western liberal education taught me to find two sources to confirm a story. Also, as an American I don’t trust most of the ‘journalism’ I see today due to media consolidation and shady ownership. I Sure as hell don’t trust the White House or state department (regardless of administration) or any other government messaging. Additionally, the US concern for Ukraine is due to Cold War by proxy. If it wasn’t Russia we wouldn’t care.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Western liberal education taught me to find two sources to confirm a story.

          the epstein oligarchy understand the truth perfectly. That’s why they’ve spent millions burying it and why your hegemon’s own OFFICIAL documentation – like the FOIA releases – flatly contradict the corporate or academic presses.

      • reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I really hope you are just trolling with this post and these replies.

        Otherwise, I wish you the best of luck in chasing down the intelligence and wisdom that has clearly outpaced you so far.

        • Smackyroon@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          rofl yas just write off any attempts to pierce the empire liberal narrative as trolling, nice job avoiding that dangerous “propaganda”

          • nonius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Perhaps it would be more productive to answer questions earnestly at least once before crying troll

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Bullshit. Russia used the same tactic as Israel to invade. it is always the same excuse for invaders create a fake eminent threat to do what they always wanted to do controlling the area.

        • folaht@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Russia used the same tactic as Israel to invade.

          No they didn’t.
          Israel used an attack on Israel from occupied territory as an excuse to do a full-scale genocide.

          Russia went to Kiev to demand Zelensky to lay down arms in the Donbass,
          end the civil war and allow Donbass separation from a military couped Ukraine.
          If not, there Russia would continue with its special military operation
          and demand all historic Russian Oblasts granted to Ukraine by Russia,
          back to Russia.

          it is always the same excuse for invaders create a fake eminent threat

          No, one was about dealing with a terrorist threat
          by attempting to genocide multiple civilizations,
          the other acts accordingly after one side,
          a Ukranian puppet leader
          that takes direct orders from the US, where he breaks all treaties
          and a US who literally tells Russia
          “we’re gonna do whatever we want,
          place weapons wherever we want,
          kill whomever we want,
          break every treaty we want,
          and you’re not going to do anything about it,
          deal with it”.

          “A civilization is going to die tonight”
          after a country defends its own country
          is what the US is all about.

          • mrdown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Putin talks about how Ukraine is an artificial state and that it is russian. Israel claim that Palestinians are Arab colonizer and that Palestine and Palestinians never existed . They are the same using national security pretense to invade. Putin is a great friend of israel. The usa imperialist reason to support Ukraine do not change the fact that Russia is a real threat to Ukraine

            • folaht@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              Both are true and both Palestine and Ukraine needed to decrease their size.
              Around half for Palestine compared to their 1945 borders
              and around half for Ukraine to Russia,
              further land can be claimed by Hungary, Slovakia and Poland.

              The difference is is that for Russia

              1. Russians are already living in Ukraine because their parents/grandparents never left.
              2. They wanted to vote to separate from Ukraine in Donbass but were shot at the voting booth, even killed.
              3. Russia was open to discuss where the new borders would stand, but Ukraine demanded Crimea back where 90+% of the people voted to leave Ukraine.

              Israel on the other hand

              1. It’s all Euro-import.
              2. No one gets to vote and they kill everyone not Israeli and bulldoze/bomb their homes. They kill every man, woman and child. Israel genocides like Nazi Germany, except worse, because they kill everyone of every country it has so far invaded.
              3. Israel demands the entire Middle East. Multiple Arab nations that have no Israeli history whatsoever.
  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Russia could always surrender. But Russia wants to kill Ukraine’s civilian population in a war of aggression started by Russia without Russian soil and civilians being attacked in return ?

    That sounds incredibly naive or incredibly bad faith.

    • Formless Oedon@lemmy.mlB
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why would they surrender they’re winning the war

      Have you seen any recurrence of the last big showy drone attack on the air base in Russia? I do not think you will see recurrence of the current PR-centered campaign. Nor success with Crimea. Kursk didn’t do anything. What is the plan supposed to be

    • Smackyroon@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Rofl why would Russia surrender and allow the Nazi puppet state of ukraine to continue its genocide against ethnic russians? “War of agression started by Russia” Wrong again, the war is a war of agression…by the empire using their installed regime to kick off the proxy war