• vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now do

    Chrome can now suggest you files from your and your friends hard drives

    • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I used to use WebKit based browsers like w3m and terminal based browsers like lynx. Also used a lot of terminal based apps for things, not really for security but because my netbooks single core atom chip sucked. I noticed though that I essentially avoided cookies, ads, and trackers by accident. I’ve been thinking of going back to a thermal based life. Now I’m wondering if there are terminal based apps for Lemmy and mastadon.

      • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Now I’m wondering if there are terminal based apps for Lemmy and mastadon.

        Mastodon, yes. I’ve not found one for Lemmy.

        • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I would have to check out the API for Lemmy to see how easy it would be to make a minimal terminal CLI would be to make. I hate making stuff publicly because I usually only want what I need to work, but I could make a repo and see if anyone else is interested in expanding on it.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The headline seems a little inflammatory. It requires the user to explicitly select a region to share.

    Google is making Gemini a lot more aware of what’s happening inside Chrome. The company has started rolling out a new “Select from screen” feature that lets users highlight specific text or images from a webpage and send them directly to Gemini, making conversations with the AI assistant far more contextual.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s baffling that over and over and over, every fucking time a corporation does this shit, there’s someone willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          At some point, you become a useful idiot.

          Don’t fall for the trap. These people do not deserve the benefit of the doubt about anything. Stop giving it to them.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          “I like to unquestioningly trust people who have repeatedly betrayed my trust in the past, just because they have a token safeguard in place. Surely they won’t rug pull us again and do the thing they always do.”

    • plz1@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      The fact that it can do it in the first place means it can do it at all. Just because they require the selection now, doesn’t mean they aren’t harvesting telemetry 24/7, and won’t “accidentally” enable this feature later.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          they will not be caught

          They would get caught tho, there’s always some turbo nerd that has a network monitor up and will notice the traffic being sent out. I do it sometimes when I actually have to use chrome, but that’s just my growing distrust of Google.

          Now, whether or not they face repercussions is another story.

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, it can definitely read the entire browser window, fill out and click through forms etc etc. i know, I’ve used it.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        That might be true, but it sounds like like a completely different feature than what the article is discussing. This is talking about a new feature that requires the user to select a specific section of the page in order to make it visible to the I’m LLM.

        I am a little confused though, as to why this new feature would be needed if it could already read the entire screen.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Every day, I grow happier for having ditched Google’s version of Android for GrapheneOS.

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Meh. It’s still mainly backed by Google in the end. I’d rather coalesce around mobile Linux. It’s not ready yet but that’s far preferable.

    • mild_deviation@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I keep hoping for the 10 Fold to go on sale again, but with component prices being the way they are, I don’t think it’s going to happen for me. Will wait and see how it shakes out for the 11, and if it’s still too bonkers, settle for a used 10.

    • binux@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Maybe innocent people who aren’t as technically literate as you that also happen to be using Chrome don’t deserve for their rights to be infringed upon? If that’s an unpopular thought then so be it I suppose.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s true.

        Anyone in this community that is still using Chrome definitely deserves it, though.

        • MrGeneric@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          More and more apps and websites are not working for me (especially in school) unless I turn off my VPN and use a Chrome based browser it’s super frustrating

  • forbiddencherry@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Gemini is already creeping me out with all the personal information Google is injecting into the AI context. So far I’ve seen my name, location and if I remember right, which vehicle I drive. Who knows what else is in there. I use DDG whenever I can, but sometimes a Google search is the only way to actually find something, so I see the Gemini junk as I’m scrolling down.

    Is there any way to have that info deleted and no longer collected or used by Google? Or is that kind of thing only for the lucky people in Europe?

    EDIT: Found it here: https://myactivity.google.com/product/gemini?hl=en-US

    • scytale@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can use startpage. It just proxies your searches to google, so you get the same results as a direct google search. I think you can also use !g on DDG.

      • forbiddencherry@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        I’ll have to try out !g, thanks a lot!

        EDIT: Tried it and it just redirected to google.com. I was hoping it would have kept me on DDG for privacy and just presented a first page of results or something like that.

        EDIT 2: Startpage is great! This will be my go-to when DDG doesn’t work out.

    • iamthetot@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I use DDG whenever I can, but sometimes a Google search is the only way to actually find something

      Do you have an example of something you had to use Google for because you couldn’t find it with DDG?

      Edited to add, four replies later and no specific examples. I am not trying to shill for DDG or anything here, I’m trying to get real, specific examples.

      • nickiwest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I was trying to find out the background of Mary being portrayed with ultramarine robes in Catholic art (because it was mentioned in Sacré Bleu by Christopher Moore), and DDG’s links were largely useless.

        I tried Google, which was better. Kagi gave me much higher-quality results. It’s probably time to bite the bullet and pay for a subscription.

        • iamthetot@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Hm man I just tried “Mary ultramarine robes” in both DDG and Google and I found DDG’s mildly better. One web result was shared on the first page of both, but Google’s first page was half pictures, ads, and reddit links.

      • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        All þe time. DDG is getting worse over time, somehow. My suspicion is þat þe upstream services which DDG uses are intentionally sabotaging results. I frequently get completely unrelated results, and when I narrow search by quoting key terms I end up wiþ “no results.” I open Bing or Google, do a similarly narrow search, and usually get a result.

        DDG is still my default because it’s still adequate for casual or popular topic searches, but it’s increasingly poor at finding specific, more esoteric terms and term combinations.

      • forbiddencherry@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I’m trying to get real, specific examples.

        Asking for unnecessary specifics and details is usually a sign not that the person wants to be helpful but that they disagree and are looking for ammunition to argue and feel superior. Ultimately the exchange becomes a waste of everyone’s time, as the person inevitably becomes rude, condescending and argumentative. Basically, some people online think they’re smarter than everyone else, or at least want to project that. They believe they have the only valid argument and they’re going to prove it to the world and probably think that they’ve won because they had the last word when in reality everyone left because they realized the person was not arguing in good faith. I’m not claiming you’re that type of person, but I suspect that’s why nobody is giving you specifics.

        Wouldn’t have mentioned anything but you did ask.

        • iamthetot@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I don’t see how it’s unnecessary to get more details about why something wasn’t working for them.

          I also hate that everything online is considered an argument these days. No one just has conversations. Lemmy and reddit don’t help in that regard with up and downvotes encouraging group think.

          Anyway, this is a huge tangent and not on topic, my bad.

          • forbiddencherry@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I agree with you that online conversations are rare these days. Just my personal opinion but social media isn’t usually great for conversations. It’s better for shallow comments, drive-by’s, and echo chambers. Social media also tends to steer toward blind comments, so there is a lot of repetition. Forums seem to be better for conversations because there’s often a emphasis on reading the entire thread before commenting, there is more moderation, and also because they tend to accrue replies more slowly. However if a thread becomes too long then forums break down too, so nothing is perfect.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not OP, but its true. There have been times I’ve searched and tweaked like 7 times. Go to google with my original text and its the first link. This is not common though.

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m really curious where things fall short for people. I haven’t used Google for years at this point, and I don’t miss it.

      • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I tried switching to ddg several times over the last decade or so and always gave up because of issues like this, especially with technical or obscure topics. Recently started paying for Kagi and do not have the same issues at all there. The results are good and nicely presented without ads. Of course, on the flip side it’s pretty expensive.

        • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah, þis. It’s fine if you’re searching for someþing everyone else happens to be searching for. It’s become pretty crap if you’re researching someþing more unusual. Parser libraries for a less popular data format, for example.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        For me, I !g sometimes when I’m searching for specific gifs, and DDG isn’t getting me the results I need. For the most part, that’s it.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I get increasingly jaded with every bit of news that basically says “yet another reason to not use Google, integrated/agentic AI etc.” When will it be enough to make even IT-illiterates consider?

    • ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I stopped worrying about IT illiterates long ago… Same reason I don’t want the masses flocking to Linux. They’ll find a way to ruin it.