For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    When will marketing people figure out our generation views ads as hostile, non-consensual, and unwanted? They are a negative way to introduce us to your product/service. I actively avoid things with obnoxious ads. Native, old spice, liberty mutual, all of those brands the first thing that comes to mind is the negative experience of an invasive advertisement I never fucking asked for.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Ads aren’t always there to get you to buy something specific. In fact, an ad you don’t interact with is a better ad because they don’t have to pay for click-through.

      You don’t want to buy brand A because they have ads, so you buy brand B instead, but both widgets are owned by the same holding company. Or they’re made in the same factory. Or they use the same components. Or they have the same shareholders. Any way you slice it, the same rich assholes are getting your money.

      The goal of the Ads is to put a bug in your head and get you to buy something.

      And that’s just the Ads. The tracking is also (increasingly primarily) about political manipulation and surveillance.

    • HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Except we are not customers, and it’s the customers that are important. I’s like cows asking between themselves when will the butcher realize that they do not like being killed for meat.

      Butcher knows, but butcher doesn’t sell comfort to cows, he sells meat to customers.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      They’re too busy milking the boomers for now (and even then, the smart ones also despise ads already)

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Apparently not, as ads keep selling.

      I hate to sound so cynical, but many folks are gullible. They’ll trust a flashy ad because it looks nice to them, and gives them a positive emotional response, and then internalize that judgement as their own decision (so when someone comes to challenge it, they take it personally).

      It’s not just old people living in another time, either. I’ve watched teenagers and young adults trust obviously-sponsored influencers like they’re friends. Or wear brands as status symbols.

            • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              Those sites will be dead to me :)

              QR codes are like the popups of days gone by. With incredibly few exceptions, I refuse to scan them. They are so easy to redirect for nefarious purposes, and you can’t easily inspect the url to know, assuming thats something you even do. Also my phone case covers the camera and it’s a bitch to get open so I’m very choosy with what gets camera time.

    • henfredemars@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yep, sorry but not sorry. Advertisements aren’t safe. The industry has been ruined by bad actors and it’s a shame, but also not my problem.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I worked in ads only a few months and learned how fucked that industry was. They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser, sucking as much info as they can. The fact that it hasn’t been regulated to hell is shocking, and truly a failure of all leaders.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser

          That’s the crazy thing.

          You want to show me an image, maybe an animated gif, and link it to your website where you’re selling shit? Fine. Annoying, but fine.

          But I don’t care how many crocodile tears they shed about ‘but websites depend on ad income’ – I am not letting random, unvetted advertisers run arbitrary code on my computer. I don’t care if it’s in a sandbox inside a sandbox. Exploits may be found, sandboxes may be escaped. And there’s plenty of trouble they can get into even within their little sandbox, like running a fucking crypto miner or something.

          So, yeah. Adblock and noscript everywhere and always.

          • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            “Firefox doesn’t have this one feature I like so I will keep using browser made by an ad company. I’m sure there will be no consequences long term”.

            Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin

            “Oh shit. No one could have predicted this!”.

              • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                While Firefox itself can still be installed and used on rooted or non-certified Android devices, some AI-powered features may not be available on those platforms.

                Yeah, that’s not a real issue for me. Is it for you?

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              Firefox dragged its feet on an extremely useful feature for years.

              Are you seriously trying to act like Firefox hasn’t been continually shooting themselves in the foot the past decade?

              • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                I’ve been using Firefox for decades without issues. Yes, Chrome was a better browser for a long time but Firefox wasn’t that far behind and was absolutely fine browser to use.

                Do you really think Mozilla could win browser race with Google, the fucking second biggest company in the world? Of course Chrome had more features, it had basically unlimited resources at it disposal. But yeah, let’s blame Mozilla for not winning with them decisively.

                YOU are shooting yourself in the foot. You abandoned Firefox for couple of features and soon you will be browsing the web with ads. Come back and tell me how extremely useful Chrome’s features are when can you no longer skip Youtube ads.