Hope they don’t go down the enshittification rabbit hole anytime soon.

Apparently they’re transitioning to a non-profit business model

Removed by mod

Blatant Chinese propaganda on Lemmy.ml. Name a more iconic duo

Proton

Yet you still see people grumbling about how restrictions on chinese EV imports are just “American/Western Imperialism”, since people apparently don’t understand how valueable domestic production is

It’s there to continue inflating Nvidia stocks now that crypto crashed (again)

And it’s pretty consistent for Linus too. He’s been making this rant on WAN show since ChatGPT started gaining traction

Holy shit, it is. I’m really hoping that includes mobile, since it’s the only thing keeping me using a Chromium browser

Moonlight is also capable of 4k streaming

but damn if it isn’t extremely effective at sending information out of reach from governments

It’s not particularly better at it than most other social media sites/apps

Well, not digital piracy. Ye olde piracy absolutely was stealing, plus a medley of other crimes

You say that as if the garbage gets downvoted

One time I was went on there to figure out an issue in Arduino. The answer one guy gave was “I don’t know how to do this in Arduino, here’s how you do this in Java”. Not only the the mods prevent any other answers from being posted, I tried the guy’s suggestion in Java and it didn’t even work

Fusion works with WINE

As an engineer, I’ve tried FreeCAD and it’s awful. Just get a hobbyist license for Fusion360 and run it in WINE

Agreed. Russia needs to pull out of Ukraine

EDIT: Is it just me, or is it weird that I got downvoted on lemmy.ml for suggesting a country should stop being an imperialistic, kleptocratic aggressor state

You can check all your games on ProtonDB. That being said, almost any single player game will work. Same with any multiplayer game that doesn’t insist on poorly implemented anti-cheat

Lemmy.ml moment

Per your previous comment:

Yeah, not “incorrect,” just non-standard. The yardstick is:

Clearly, he was able to get there so it’s firmly in “acceptable use.”

I’m not the one conflating the two concepts.

The yardstick is: did your interpretation match the intended one?

I think that’s just you. There’s a few examples of rules in English that aren’t required to get a point across, but sentences that break them sound grating. One such example is adjective order