Yes, outlets like Reuters and AP are generally considered neutral. PBS is another, I think anyway. Plus there are international outlets.
Nothing lazier than lumping every single outlet into some monolithic blob. It also just encourages people to believe utter bullshit from social media instead.
I’m referring to US media, sir goal post mover. Reuters is from the UK and you can fuck right off with your ‘nothing lazier’ passive aggression. Easiest block all week.
Or some people pull their heads out if their arses, notice the majority of US media is owned by the same few billionaires, and they all tend to sell the same bullshit but under different branding.
right wing media calls it that. They call everything they think they don’t like “communism”.
Is there any US media that isn’t right wing?
Yes, outlets like Reuters and AP are generally considered neutral. PBS is another, I think anyway. Plus there are international outlets.
Nothing lazier than lumping every single outlet into some monolithic blob. It also just encourages people to believe utter bullshit from social media instead.
I’m referring to US media, sir goal post mover. Reuters is from the UK and you can fuck right off with your ‘nothing lazier’ passive aggression. Easiest block all week.
The Overton window is very very bad here. Msnbc/Ms now would be the closest but it’s still only 1-2 people in the network.
And no, I don’t give a flying fuck what they’d be considered in Europe, things are very different here. See the Overton window being very very bad
AP is not “right wing”. People are just lazy, stupid and prefer simple perceptions like “the media is all the same”.
Or some people pull their heads out if their arses, notice the majority of US media is owned by the same few billionaires, and they all tend to sell the same bullshit but under different branding.
But nah, that’s just being lazy.