The comment is already removed now, but OP’s post would make you believe the entire thread is full of racism and there’s no moderation.
Trying to incite outrage like OP is doing isn’t helpful for anyone.
The comment is already removed now, but OP’s post would make you believe the entire thread is full of racism and there’s no moderation.
Trying to incite outrage like OP is doing isn’t helpful for anyone.
And do you have any other examples (as you imply, the thread is full of them) than just one troll that has since been removed from the thread?
Did you comment in a wrong thread?
Because I could only find one vaguely racist comment.
Yep. When I switched out my Nvidia for AMD it was as plug-and-play as it gets.
I think there’s kind of a 3rd choice, WebKit.
That’s where Chromium came from originally, so not really 3rd.
And what else should be recommended?
The choice is basically between Firefox or skinned Chromium.
Do you really want to experience first-hand just why Internet Explorer was this hated?
Here’s a hint: de facto monopoly on browser market that allowed them to control the web standards back then and their ideas were not good.
it has become a sinking ship and I’m eager to see who picks up the shards and runs with it.
I don’t think you have any idea how much work it takes to create a new browser.
Yeah, gotta have that and all that Secure Boot with TPM bullshit, because I’m visualizing a company workstation and nothing will work without those.
Because for some reason, no matter what I try, Windows 10 desktop is laggy as hell on Qemu, and smooth out of the box on VirtualBox.
That’s a very… capitalist way of thinking.
Also, fun fact: Kagi owner believes only criminals want privacy and GDPR doesn’t apply to them, because they said so!
users expect support when things don’t work
no shit, that’s why you refuse support for users with unsupported configurations.
This is not a new concept.
It’s standard for big companies to say they only support RHEL or Ubuntu, in every other case you’re on your own.
Instead of axing their entire Linux support they could just do the reasonable thing, which is ignore issues that are out of scope.
Or should they support users trying to run their software on Windows 95, just because it’s still technically Windows?
But they’re not - it’s the same old, tired excuse that was never true.
“Too many different distros” was never really a good argument.
Just support one and users will figure it out, like we always do.
I’m still not sure. It’s hard to believe anyone at their company would OK this idea.
Are they actually trying to deliberately kill their brand?
I guess you’re right. I should’ve upgraded first and checked it, oh well.
It specifically does mention that though. In Plasma 6.1 you can choose EDID, custom ICC profile or no profile.
I still don’t like it.
But it doesn’t change the fact that some big players insist on PWAs instead of standalone Electron/whatever wrappers if you want anything close to a native desktop experience instead of a browser tab.
Maybe they did, but got moderated.
Or maybe most of the critical community left reddit a while ago, I mean, the top rated question in the AMA asks about changelogs in video format…
You find out by installing MangoHud and checking which works better.
Shortly after release neither one made any real difference for me.
If anything the world needs to trend towards smaller sizes with a focus on quality over quantity.
You do realize this is about doctors, right?
In what world do you live in where fewer doctors is an improvement?
OK, I guess you can leave lemmy now, because I’m sure you can judge entire website based on a single troll’s comment (and I guarantee you’ll find plenty on lemmy). Very smart!