That’s a section of track where the break has been found and documented. At the very least, significant damage that is suspected to be related to sabotage would require additional thorough inspection of the surrounding railway.
That’s a section of track where the break has been found and documented. At the very least, significant damage that is suspected to be related to sabotage would require additional thorough inspection of the surrounding railway.
This particular rail system is pretty clearly using reinforced concrete ties.
You could do it with a hacksaw, if you had enough replacement blades. And you could do it with an arsenal of bastard files as well. Each iteration on the idea takes considerably more time and effort, though. Those rails are quite a bit tougher than you might realize.
But they don’t care as much about getting the ruling right in the first place? Is the timer on an appeal as precisely administered as a competiton timer, or is it handled with the same attention to detail as correctly scoring a routine?
Have you tried Driving 4 Answers? He goes more into the engineering side of things, but he’s got a great presentation style. He’s kind of like the Technology Connections of automotive information.
The Quicksilver Gambit? In modern chess? We’re far beyond that!
I heard the guy boiled a pot of water earlier in the day, so, you know, clearly it’s justified…
/s
For reference, the first “A” stands for “ALL”.
Yes, but you must:
A cosmic gumbo, kinda moves to the beat of jazz
Damn.