I don’t care. I watched an interview with him and his foreign policy takes were so horrid he would be laughed out of the room if he said something like this in my country. Guess some people in the UK don’t really give a crap about Ukraine.

I’m not from the UK but when I last watched something with Corbyn he was shilling for Russia, how is that not an absolute deal-breaker?

Edit: I was completely right and got downvoted for it. He wanted to stop arms to Ukraine. He sucks and can go and die in a volcano. No left-wing politicians in Poland are like this when it comes to Russia, why are western lefties so brain-dead and conciliatory to this horrible regime? Telling Ukraine to roll over and give up its land. Fuck you tankie POS.

I’ll just use Firefox mobile with uBlock Origin then, literally anything is better than ads

Duder here defending a literal islamofascist monarchy that kills gay people and journalists, and an authoritarian one party state that uses Han ethnonationalism to replace native populations they conquered and puts minorities into concentration camps Edit: you can’t even spell echo right lol

So we’re supposed to just wait until he’s emergency-killing those civilians to avoid discovery/steal from them while on the ground, like the Russian bloke did? Or bombing cities, killing hudreds or thousands?

But the pilot is already a soldier

But if they land somewhere the opposing troops can’t reach them, you can know in advance they won’t surrender.

Edit: it shouldn’t be a controversial notion that you won’t surrender in friendly territory.

I actually disagree with this one. Pilots will kill more people through bombing unless killed if allowed to return to their planes later. Unless you can be sure of their capture there’s no reason to let them live, from a humanitarian perspective. There was even this case where a pilot from a Russian aircraft killed a civilian on the ground. This rule just never made sense to me - you don’t have that with the crew leaving a tank, do you?

California has like 40M people. That’s ten cents per person, spread over 6 years. It’s literally nothing. A road costs more to bankroll (I tried looking up a specific figure but they’re all over the place).

Exit polls say the opposition has the majority, in short PiS is gone

Well, I’ve lived through it. We had tried before, and I’ve already voted today. Cut us some slack, PiS polls at around 35%, but due to political fragmentation and the D’Hont system favoring big parties they’ve managed to win two elections. They do not represent the average Pole, definitely not in this day and age.

Then why mention the time period in your original comment?

You say a decade but that’s just two election cycles, in the grand scale of things it’s not that long

It doesn’t need to spread it from nothing, but expand and utilize? Absolutely possible

The US is more to the right on average than Cornel West. He won’t win. Even if that wasn’t the case, people would still mostly vote for the Democratic candidate (in this case Joe Biden), because the Democratic Party is more established and expected to get more votes based on past elections. People are aware of the system used for voting in their country and vote accordingly. Children can understand this, so why are you this obtuse?

Why would golfscript be more verbose than some others? Isn’t it made for golfing?

Putin Learns Putin Behind Plot To Assassinate Putin

Wagner was Dmitry Utkin’s pseudonym. But I’m sure the guy was talking about Prigozhin.

“You” doesn’t mean I’m talking to the bot, I’m using it as a general descriptor for a person. I could have said “I understand being cautious with one’s statements”, but that’s very formal and unnecessary in a comment on a social media website. I can easily imagine you reading a sentence like “You need to study really hard to get to Harvard” and think someone is talking to you personally instead of making a general statement.

Communication is a cooperative process, interpreting what others say maliciously and automatically assuming they made a mistake is the definition of “bad faith engagement”.

Edit: to clarify even further: since I commented on the text of the article, I’m replying to the summary. Maybe that’s the part you’re confused by.

Ukrainian officials also claimed their Air Force claimed it had destroyed fifteen Russian-made drones and carried out ten group attacks, the outlet reports.

That’s way too many qualifiers. I understand being cautious with your statements, but this is almost unreadable.