

1·
4 days agoTypst isn’t bad. I like it for it’s font handling over LaTeX. However, if the font you want has a package, it’s better to go with LaTeX for its portability.
An asexual bigender libertarian socialist and Episcopalian operating out of the Heartland of the US. I love free and liberating operating systems of all sorts.


Typst isn’t bad. I like it for it’s font handling over LaTeX. However, if the font you want has a package, it’s better to go with LaTeX for its portability.


You know, if we were taught to use something like LaTeX, this wouldn’t be an issue because of BEAMER
I would have to agree with dream_weasel. It’s all about portability. Though, I would like to add on accurate reproducibility. LibreOffice’s font rendering differs from system to system. A typesetting system like roff, TeX, and Typst aims to be reproducible, with TeX being the most as it uses packages and its own font format for rendering. The same argument can be made with MIDI vs Module. While MIDI can be used everywhere, all it is is just note data and metrics. Modules contain all of that plus the sample data, allowing for near perfect reproduction.