Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Reached up for the pot? So you acknowledge she wasn’t holding it then. It’s not like it was a gun, you’d have plenty of warning if she attempted to do something crazy with it (which is not at all clear from the video that she would have).
What do you get out of trolling like this?
You said she threatened the cops, which never happened. She was shot after she let go of the pot, which the police had told her to take care of in the first place!
This asshole was looking for an excuse to murder someone, and you’re bending over backwards to give it to him. Shame on you, and I hope you run into a cop having a bad day.
Not what happened. Go watch the video.
Oh piss off you know what you meant
Well that fence just wasn’t strong enough!
You’re right, the correct term is bigot. You’re a bigot.
Sanctions that China also voted for, making this irrational and illogical behavior, in addition to being dangerous and provocative.
While the boy admitted to sharing photos, it also said they didn’t find any so there may have been a lack of evidence for that.
The issue is not her stint in politics, but rather her election denialism and attacks on journalists.
But feel free to explain your point if you have one.
Sure bro, I can see you’ve got your talking points. Don’t forget to stick to the script, you’re doing great.
Culpable in the genocide? Yes. Carpet bombing anybody? No. Facts matter.
He said USA carpet bombing, not Israel. You wanna criticize arms sales to Israel, feel free. That’s a real problem, as opposed to the fake one presented by op.
What carpet bombing lol. You tankies love saying random provocative bullshit.
The person you replied to was talking about sustenance. Read again.
You don’t have a point, you’re just here to stir up shit for fun. I don’t know why you enjoy that, maybe you should consider why you feel that way.
Why are you acting like Trump wouldn’t support the genocide? It’s not a choice between genocide and not, so yes you are in fact just trolling for trump.
You made a claim about “more burnouts”, and when challenged decided to list every problem you could think of with weed instead of admitting you have no evidence for more burnouts.
You also appear to be conflating consequences associated with prohibition, such as academic ineligibility, with the effects of the actual drug. The point of decriminalizing is to stop ruining people’s lives over a drug.
I don’t think incivility deserves civility in return, but apparently you were being sarcastic? It’s hard to distinguish because people unironically say the same things you did.