I think you’re mixing two different things here. Discussions about unions, working conditions, workplace policies, fairness, etc. have a direct bearing on the workplace and the people in it. Yes, these things are political but they also directly impact the workplace and the people in the organization. I think these topics are all fine.

That’s different from Pam in HR reminding you that she Stands With Israel when you work in a company that has no connection at all to Israel, weapons manufacturing, etc. Or maybe they want to harass you for your own views or trade in conspiracy theories. Their co-workers are a captive audience for these rants because they have to deal with these people to do their jobs.

To me it’s not about loving capitalism, it’s about not wanting yet one more sphere of life to be a stage for performative displays of tribal affiliation.

We have oil tycoons run our climate summits, so sure, why not.

Maybe we can get SBF and Bernie Madoff to put something together on fiscal responsibility.

The Intercept has a long, detailed piece on NYT’s coverage claiming systemic sexual violence on 10/7:

https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/

I knew the Times leaned pro-Israel, but this report was pretty surprising in terms of failing to meet basic journalistic standards.

You’re right, but you could say the same about the National Park GIS lookup.