China has ranked first in the share of published papers since 2017, the top 10% most-cited papers since 2018 and the top 1% since 2019.
Moving the goalposts as a coping mechanism
https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2023/article_0013.html
fuck interlectual property in general, so even if China did steal IP from other countries (it didn’t), I’d respect them even more
Cope lib
China retains crown in scientific papers, widens lead over U.S. https://archive.md/BFUU0
I mean yeah one has a bourgeois state (US) and the other an proletarian one (PRC) so technically you’re right in that it’s not really comparable.
Do you know what hegemony means? And do you think it’s a coincidence that you hold the same belief as the US state department?
You sound so gullible to believe a nationalist government will give up it’s territorial claims on their own Accord lol
Of course you believe in American exceptionalism
The NED funded protests in HK were genocide… interesting. Do you have a source on that?
How could china have handled the NED funded protest in Hong Kong better in your opinion?
cope lol
I hope I don’t sound rude but it really sounds like you only consider WaPo trustworthy when it’s convenient for you.
Is it really that hard to consider context?
Thoughtexperiment: You have a neo-nazi outlet having two reports. One is citing high ranking fascists talking about problems in their organization spilling insider knowledge that no other outlet wrote about. A second report is on ethnic and sexual minorities. Would you consider these two reports to be of the same value or would you “consider one of them when convenient for you”? (Don’t actually read Nazi outlets obv)
Besides, the media in China are heavily controlled by the government. I don’t think a news outlet would survive if they dared to report such things.
I said for the source to be equivalent. Ofc you can cite a western source, but I’ll read it like its a neo-nazi rag writing about ethnic minorities aka it being heavily biased
Also just an fyi there are Chinese outlets reporting on Xinjiang…
Sorry, I don’t understand how that makes this any less trustworthy
Please read up on Adrian Zenz, read about the methodology and the report on Xinjiang itself and think if it’s not suspensious that every western outlet cites him (or military funded think Tanks like ASPI) and his very thin findings
Also here’s an QA with Zenz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dwy7KE7WoNo (The non cringy edit is hard to find, I wonder why that is)
No offence but your lack of media literacy is showing…
You understand that using WaPo as a source for American wrong doings is not the same as using WaPo as a source for wrong doings it’s geopolitical rival. You’d need a Chinese outlet admitting to their faults for it to be equivalent…
Nonetheless I clicked on your link:
The disclosure comes in an investigative report from the Associated Press and a new research report by scholar Adrian Zenz for the Jamestown Foundation.
Literally the second paragraph…
Uh oh someone sounds upset
Thank you for your valuable comment
China is listed as the largest and 5th largest in your source