I do, but it’s also a shame that mozilla.social is shutting down.
I do, but it’s also a shame that mozilla.social is shutting down.
Gnome itself is actually not bad. It has a full screen menu and arrangeable application icons and folders, but I cannot group them the way I want, let alone resize them.
I don’t think resizing is an option, but isn’t it possible to drag one app’s icon on top of another app’s icon to create a group?
Yep, not something I’ve noticed.
Looking at the current status, it’s a matter of “not turning it on” rather than “turning it off”, even.
the Internet is embracing AI whether we like it or not
And if not, the feature gets removed again in a year or so. So far it doesn’t really seem like it’s in your face or anything, so 🤷
I don’t know if OP is talking about any specific measures, but in general, I know that Firefox is trying to strike a good balance with its defaults, making it as privacy-respecting as possible without causing half the web to break, or accidentally decreasing people’s privacy.
Nevertheless there are projects like Arkenfox, Librewolf, or people manually messing around in about:config
flipping flags like privacy.resistFingerprinting
(lots of breakage there!), claiming that they increase privacy.
And of course to some extent they do, it’s just that if, a month later, you try to modify a Google Doc and find out that everything is blurry, you’ll have forgotten that you flipped that pref, and switch to a less private browser.
What if people think they have to hack it, but in fact are making themselves more fingerprintable and/or exposing themselves to website breakage that would be unacceptable for most people?
Probably not exactly what you’re asking for (but maybe try finding an extension that does it?), but would it be an option to set Firefox to always Open previous windows and tabs? AFAIK that also restores their container associations.
Now there’s a meme I haven’t seen in a while.
And most old Flash content is basically gone now.
And where did you find that they will do that?
You tell me how it will result in it happening. Who even has the power to force people to learn Rust?
Then just not use it? You could even ask for a refund, I’m sure they’ll give it to you.
That person in the audience was really grinding my gears. Just let the folks you’re talking to answer you; no need to keep going on your diatribe when it’s based on a false assumption and waste the whole room’s time.
This sounds exactly like the type of nontechnical nonsense they’re complaining about: attacking a strawman (“they’re trying to prevent people from refactoring C code and making them rewrite everything in the current fancy language”) even after explicitly calling out that that was not going to happen (“and to reiterate, no one is trying force anyone else to learn Rust nor prevent refactorings of C code”).
It’s also not clear how long they’d be able to keep that up anyway, given… https://techcrunch.com/2024/08/28/brave-lays-off-27-employees/
Desktop web apps are being looked at though, so there’s that!
Great to hear! I’ve never used Redox either, so no idea how well that works too.
Especially if it’s just another alpha release. They could have 20 more of those, for all I know.