That’s a wonderfully specific yet accurate description. Up you go.

Yes it was a bad interview hence me saying he said a bunch of nothing.

I was higher on Jeffries until I heard him interviewed by John Stewart. He said a bunch of nothing just like the rest of the party.

AOC’s interview was significantly better.

Can Elmo say the word if Elmo is singing his favorite song?

You think that guy knows his sign is upside down?

“We shouldn’t reward journalists who try to destroy people. Ever,” said Vance, referring to the fact that The Wall Street Journal on Thursday exposed Elez’s connection to an X account that made the inflammatory tweets.

Destroy people by simply pointing out what those people said lol.

I know she’s been villainized by the right, but I feel like, at this point, she needs to be elevated to key leadership of the party. She’s the only one who seems to be able to speak to specifics. I just listened to Jeffries on Jon Stewart’s podcast and it was all of the same old generalities.

Imagine being too racist for this regime? That’s a pretty high bar to reach.

Man, if you don’t agree with her views, fine whatever. But for people to hate her so much to claim she’s corrupt when she’s clearly not is just silly.

We live in a stupid timeline. More politicians should be like her. We’d all be better off, regardless of which party they were from.

Just use Firefox.